What Good Are Your Cracks?

Some days, I sit down to write and wonder what the hell I’m doing.

The words don’t flow. The structure feels off. My confidence has left the building and is probably sitting at a pub somewhere ordering beer, wings, and nachos without me.

You’d think after years in law enforcement, forensics, and now crime writing, I’d be bulletproof by now—impervious to self-doubt and rejection. But nope. There are days I feel like a cracked pot.

And that, my fellow Kill Zoners, brings me to a story I want to share with you. It’s an old one. A quiet one. But it says everything a writer needs to hear.

The Story of the Cracked Pot

There was an old man who lived in a village in India. Every morning, he would place a long stick across his back, hang a water pot from each end, and walk several miles to the river to get fresh water for his family.

But the two water pots were not the same. One had a series of small cracks in its side, causing it to leak.

The old man would fill both pots at the river, but by the time he got back to his home, the cracked pot would be half empty, the water having leaked out during the walk.

The cracked pot grew increasingly ashamed of its inability to complete the task for which it was made. One day, while the old man filled the two pots at the river, the cracked pot spoke to him.

“I’m sorry. I’m so embarrassed that I cannot fulfill my responsibilities as well as the other pot.”

The old man smiled and replied, “On the walk home today, rather than hanging your head in shame, I want you to look up at the side of the path.”

The cracked pot reluctantly agreed to do as the old man asked. As they left the riverbank and started on the path, he couldn’t believe his eyes.

On his side of the path was a beautiful row of flowers.

“You see,” the old man said, “I’ve always known you had those cracks, so I planted flower seeds along your side of the path. Each day, your cracks helped me water them. And now, I pick these flowers to share their beauty with the entire village.”

We All Leak a Little

That story gets me every time.

Because if you’ve ever tried to create something from nothing, to sit at a keyboard and bring life to characters who don’t exist yet, then you know what it means to question your usefulness. You know what it feels like to compare yourself to someone else’s perfect pot—and wonder why your own words keep leaking out, incomplete, imperfect, maybe even irrelevant.

But what if your cracks are the very thing that make your writing beautiful?

What if the years you spent doubting yourself taught you empathy—and now your characters breathe with it?

What if the rejections, the self-edits, the tough critiques… what if those watered something beside the path you just haven’t noticed yet?

I’m not here to hand you a participation ribbon or pat your head and say, “You’re special.” You already know writing is hard. It takes guts. It takes sitting with discomfort and pushing through.

But I am here to tell you that those imperfections you think are holding you back?

They’re feeding the flowers.

Keep Leaking

Maybe your story structure feels like a mess. Maybe your plot sagged in Act Two and hasn’t recovered. Maybe someone told you you’d never make it—and part of you believed them.

Here’s what I want you to remember.

There is no perfect pot.

Even the bestselling author you admire struggles with the page. Even the literary genius has doubt gnawing at the back of their brain. The difference is, they kept walking the path. Cracks and all.

And if you do the same—keep showing up, keep pouring yourself into the process, keep leaking a little water every day—you’ll be amazed at what grows.

You don’t have to be flawless to be useful. You don’t have to be brilliant to be beautiful. And you sure as hell don’t need to write like anyone else to make an impact.

You just need to walk your path.

Let the seeds you’ve planted over the years—your discipline, your voice, your scars, your strange and wonderful perspective—be watered by your imperfections.

Keep writing.

You have no idea how many flowers are blooming because of you.

Kill Zoners – Show us your cracks.

The Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest is Dead

Sad news to report: After 42 years, the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, which showed how hilariously horrible the English language can be, is no more after its founder decided to retire it. Founded in 1983, the contest was to compose the most atrocious opening sentence to the worst novel never written.

If you think Edward Buller-Lytton’s opus, “It was a dark and stormy night…” was a masterpiece of pukable purple prose, you should check out some of the beauts and treasures housed at the BLFC website. I spent time scrolling through the list of winners and runners-up for each year. In no orchestrated and orderly organization, here are some spectacular and stunningly-silly specimens spewed by competent, creative creatives.

“Gwendolyn, a world-class mountaineer, summoned the last of her strength for one more heroic haul on the nylon strap (for she was, after so many failed attempts, dangerously close to exhaustion) and looked heavenward with resolve, aware that, in spite of her fatigue and anguish, she must breach the crevice in one well-coordinated movement, somehow cleave the smooth fissure with the flimsy synthetic strand even though she was chaffed raw by her repeated efforts, or more sensibly, just give the heave-ho to this new-fangled (and painfully small) Victoria’s Secret thong and slip into her well-worn – and infinitely more roomy – knickers.”

“Emile Zola wandered the dank and soggy streets of a gloomy Parisian night, the injustice of the Dreyfus affair weighing on him like a thousand baguettes, dreaming of some massage or therapy to relieve the tension and pain in his aching shoulders and back, and then suddenly he thought of his Italian friends and their newly invented warm water bath with air jets and he rapturously exclaimed that oft misquoted declaration — “Jacuzzi!”

“She strutted into my office wearing a dress that clung to her like Saran Wrap to a sloppily butchered pork knuckle, bone and sinew jutting and lurching asymmetrically beneath its folds, the tightness exaggerating the granularity of the suet and causing what little palatable meat there was to sweat, its transparency the thief of imagination.”

“Ulysses Simpson Grant, having just finished a meal of Virginia ham, stretched out in his underwear of Mississippi-grown cotton, puffed on a Georgia cigar, swilled straight Kentucky bourbon whiskey, and thought just how good it was to be in the Union Army.”

“Folks say that if you listen real close at the height of the full moon, when the wind is blowin’ off Nantucket Sound from the nor’east and the dogs are howlin’ for no earthly reason, you can hear the awful screams of the crew of the “Ellie May,” a sturdy whaler captained by John McTavish; for it was on just such a night when the rum was flowin’ and, Davey Jones be damned, big John brought his men on deck for the first of several screaming contests.”

“A small assortment of astonishingly loud brass instruments raced each other lustily to the respective ends of their distinct musical choices as the gates flew open to release a torrent of tawny fur comprised of angry yapping bullets that nipped at Desdemona’s ankles, causing her to reflect once again (as blood filled her sneakers and she fought her way through the panicking crowd) that the annual Running of the Pomeranians in Liechtenstein was a stupid, stupid idea.”

“Gerald began–but was interrupted by a piercing whistle which cost him ten percent of his hearing permanently, as it did everyone else in a ten-mile radius of the eruption, not that it mattered much because for them “permanently” meant the next ten minutes or so until buried by searing lava or suffocated by choking ash–to pee.”

“Seeing how the victim’s body, or what remained of it, was wedged between the grill of the Peterbilt 389 and the bumper of the 2008 Cadillac Escalade EXT, officer “Dirk” Dirksen wondered why reporters always used the phrase “sandwiched” to describe such a scene since there was nothing appetizing about it, but still, he thought, they might have a point because some of this would probably end up on the front of his tunic.”

“Through the gathering gloom of a late-October afternoon, along the greasy, cracked paving-stones slick from the sputum of the sky, Stanley Ruddlethorp wearily trudged up the hill from the cemetery where his wife, sister, brother, and three children were all buried, and forced open the door of his decaying house, blissfully unaware of the catastrophe that was soon to completely devastate his life.”

And this one wins the Christmas turkey…

“Space Fleet Commander Brad Brad sat in silence, surrounded by a slowly dissipating cloud of smoke, maintaining the same forlorn frown that had been fixed upon his face since he’d accidentally destroyed the phenomenon known as time, thirteen inches ago.”

Kill Zoners — Who feels creative and wants to take a crack at competing for a Bulwer-Lytton even though the contest is officially closed? If you don’t feel creative, there’s always ChatGPT.

Unlocking Your Potential as a Writer

Ever feel like you’re capable of more, but can’t quite break through? That’s potential talking. Every writer I know has it. Some are sitting on mountains of it. But here’s the truth about potential—it’s worthless unless you act on it.

Aristotle had a word for this. “Dunamis”. The latent power of becoming. He saw potential as real, not imaginary. A seed isn’t just a seed. It’s a tree in waiting. But for that to happen, it needs the right conditions and, most importantly, action.

Writers aren’t any different. I’ve been around this writing game long enough to see a hard truth. Most of us don’t come close to what we’re capable of. Me undoubtedly included.

Why?

It’s not because we’re lazy. Writers are some of the most disciplined people I know. It’s not because we lack ideas. If anything, our heads are overcrowded with them.

The real problem? Fear and friction.

Fear of rejection. Fear of not being good enough. Fear of writing something that falls flat. Fear that your next book won’t live up to the last one.

And then there’s friction. Distractions, cluttered headspace, and that nagging voice that says it’s safer to stay where you are than push forward.

Viktor Frankl—a man who understood survival and meaning better than most—said that success can’t be pursued directly. It has to result from fulfilling a purpose greater than yourself.

In plain English: if you want to unlock your potential as a writer, you need a why. Not a bestseller list. Not an advance. Not applause. But a why.

It could be telling the story only you can tell. It could be shining a light on something that matters. It could be proving to yourself that you can do it.

But potential without direction? It rots.

Something I learned from years of policing, coroner work, and writing is this. Big breakthroughs are built on small, consistent moves.

A page a day. A scene every week. A query letter sent. An uncomfortable rewrite.

Over time, these small acts compound. Like interest in the bank.  Yes, compound interest which Einstein said was the eighth wonder of the world. That’s how you turn potential into pages and pages into a book.

Three Ways to Start Unlocking Your Potential

Here are three practical strategies that helped me more than I realized at the time:

  1. Write with urgency. Stop waiting for the “perfect time” to write. It doesn’t exist. If you’ve got ten minutes, use it.
  2. Find your friction, then kill it. Is it social media? A cluttered workspace? A manuscript you dread opening because you’re scared it’s not good enough? Identify what’s slowing you down and remove it.
  3. Don’t do this alone. Every writer needs allies — critique groups, mentors, writing partners, trusted readers. Writing may be solitary, but growth isn’t.

The Writer’s Edge

If you’re a crime, thriller, or suspense writer, your stories already live in tension, uncertainty, and danger. But here’s the secret. Your potential as a storyteller is as suspenseful as any plot twist you’ll ever write.

It’s unknown. It’s waiting. And it’s yours to chase… or abandon.

The best writers I know aren’t the most talented. They’re the ones who took their potential seriously — and acted on it. And that’s your invitation.

Ask yourself today:

  • Am I where I could be?
  • Am I willing to do what it takes to get there?
  • What am I avoiding that would unlock my next level?

Your potential as a writer isn’t some lofty idea. It’s real. It’s waiting.

And the best time to tap into it? It’s now.

Kill Zoners — Is there anyone out there who feels they’ve tapped out their true potential?

 

Paskekrims, Nordic Noir, and Why Cold-Blooded Crime is So Hot

Let’s start with a weird one.

Every Easter, Norwegians curl up with a murder mystery—yes, it’s a thing. It’s called Paskekrims (Easter Crime), and it’s become a cultural phenomenon that helps explain the broader global fascination with what we now call Nordic Noir.

Nordic Noir is one of the most distinctive and powerful genres in modern crime fiction. It’s bleak. It’s brooding. And it’s booming.

At its core, Nordic Noir is a subgenre of crime fiction rooted in the Scandinavian region—primarily Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland. It’s defined by a cold, moody atmosphere, morally complex characters, stark landscapes, and a tendency to tackle tough social issues. And readers (and viewers) can’t seem to get enough of it.

These stories often feature detectives who are brilliant but broken. They drink too much. They carry baggage. And they stumble through layers of societal decay while trying to solve some pretty grisly crimes.

Unlike the fast-paced, high-gloss thrillers of the American tradition, Nordic Noir takes its time. It broods. It simmers. It invites readers into a grim world where the answers aren’t easy and justice is rarely clean.

So, what makes this genre so addictive?

It’s not just the murders—although Nordic Noir rarely skimps on body count. It’s the mood, the psychology, and the haunting realism. These stories feel like they could actually happen, and maybe already did.

If you’ve read The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson, you’ve tasted the genre. Larsson helped ignite the global boom in Nordic Noir with his Millennium trilogy. But he wasn’t the first—and he won’t be the last.

Let’s rewind. The roots of Nordic Noir go back to the 1960s, when Swedish couple Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö wrote a ten-book series featuring detective Martin Beck. Their work combined police procedural storytelling with pointed critiques of the Scandinavian welfare state. It was slow-burning, socially conscious, and incredibly influential.

From there, the torch passed to Henning Mankell. His Kurt Wallander novels cemented the genre’s tone—gritty, introspective, and unflinchingly honest about human flaws. Mankell sold over 40 million books worldwide and inspired a hit British TV series starring Kenneth Branagh.

Then came Jo Nesbø. The Norwegian rocker-turned-writer gave us Harry Hole, a deeply damaged detective with a nose for murder and a streak of self-destruction a mile wide. Nesbø’s books are dark, violent, smart, and among the most commercially successful crime novels in the world.

Other heavy hitters include:

  • Camilla Läckberg – Known for her Fjällbacka series, blending domestic drama with psychological suspense.
  • Arnaldur Indriðason – Icelandic master of mood, famed for his melancholic Inspector Erlendur
  • Yrsa Sigurðardóttir – Iceland again, combining crime with a touch of horror.
  • Jussi Adler-Olsen – Danish author of the Department Q series, known for its humor and depth.
  • Åsa Larsson, Tove Alsterdal, and a growing chorus of new voices bringing even more nuance and variety to the genre.

The settings matter almost as much as the characters. Long, dark winters. Snow-covered forests. Isolated cabins. Stark urban backdrops. The geography of Scandinavia becomes a character in itself—one that seeps into the bones of the story.

And then there’s Paskekrims—which literally translates to “Easter Crime.”

Since the 1920s, Norwegians have been reading murder mysteries during Easter break. Publishers release special “Easter Thrillers” just for the occasion, often advertised on milk cartons, buses, and chocolate egg wrappers. It’s a country-wide obsession that shows just how culturally embedded crime fiction is in Nordic life.

So why is Nordic Noir so popular beyond Scandinavia? Three reasons.

First, it’s authentic. These stories aren’t sugarcoated or over-produced—they reflect real social anxieties, from immigration and inequality to misogyny and corruption.

Second, it’s cerebral. The puzzles are dense, the motives complex, and the moral lines fuzzy. Readers get to engage their brains, not just their guts.

Third, it’s emotional. Despite their stoicism, these characters bleed—inside and out. And their quiet suffering makes them deeply relatable, even as they chase monsters through the snow.

From a reader demographic standpoint, Nordic Noir draws a global audience. It’s especially popular among readers aged 30 to 65 who enjoy character-driven crime fiction with psychological depth. Women make up a large portion of the readership, particularly for authors like Läckberg and Sigurðardóttir.

And it’s not just books. Nordic Noir has exploded on screen, too. Think The Bridge, Borgen, Trapped, Wallander, Deadwind, Snabba Cash, and The Killing. These series have reached international audiences through streaming platforms like Netflix and HBO, often adapted into American or British versions.

As crime writers, there’s a lot we can learn from Nordic Noir. You don’t need a ton of action if you’ve got atmosphere and character. You don’t need a tidy ending if you’ve earned emotional truth. And sometimes, the most terrifying villain isn’t the killer—it’s the society that lets it all happen.

Looking ahead, Nordic Noir isn’t going anywhere. New voices are emerging, and old ones are evolving. The genre is diversifying, tackling fresh issues like environmental collapse, tech dystopias, and generational trauma—all with that trademark Scandinavian chill.

There’s even crossover with other genres now—crime blended with sci-fi, climate fiction, and historical mystery. The cold, it seems, has legs.

So if you’re a crime writer looking to expand your style, sharpen your realism, or deepen your emotional range, study the Nordics. Read them. Watch them. Analyze how they use silence, setting, and character wounds to elevate what could otherwise be just another dead body in the snow.

And hey, maybe next Easter, you’ll find yourself curled up with a Paskekrims of your own.

Kill Zoners — Who out there is into Nordic Noir? Any suggestions as to other NN authors and books? Comments?

And Now You Know… the Rest of the Story

“Hello, Americans. I’m Paul Harvey… Stand by for news.”

If you grew up with a radio anywhere in earshot from the 1950s through the early 2000s, chances are you’ve heard that familiar, melodic cadence. Paul Harvey’s voice wasn’t just a part of American broadcasting—it was American broadcasting. Like the tick of an old kitchen clock, his short-form radio features delivered history, mystery, and moral insight in under five minutes. But what truly made his stories unforgettable were the endings—those last few lines that turned everything on its head.

“And now you know… the rest of the story.”

That catchphrase was the kicker. The hook. The twist. The reason we all kept listening, leaned in, smiled, gasped, or even teared up. And for us writers, it holds a masterclass in storytelling structure, suspense, and emotional payoff.

Who Was Paul Harvey?

Paul Harvey Aurandt was born in 1918 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. After losing his policeman father to a tragic shooting when Paul was only three, Harvey grew up in a world shaped by grit, survival, and the power of words. He started in radio as a teenager and worked his way up through the golden age of broadcasting.

By the 1950s, he was a national presence. With his distinct pauses, curious phrasing, and Midwestern moral clarity, Harvey captivated millions of listeners across decades. He delivered daily news commentary, but it was his mid-day feature—“The Rest of the Story”—that elevated him from commentator to storyteller.

These were not breaking news segments. They were human stories—true stories—told with elegance, economy, and a surprising punchline.

The Structure of a Paul Harvey Story

Every episode of The Rest of the Story followed a similar template:

  1. Set the Scene – Often vague at first. He introduces a person, place, or problem, but not the full identity.
  2. Build the Curiosity – Facts are layered. Oddities emerge. You’re engaged but unsure where it’s going.
  3. Reveal the Surprise – The identity or twist is saved for the final sentence. A famous person in disguise. A historical icon before they were known. A legendary outcome from humble beginnings.
  4. Moral Undercurrent – Often subtle, but present. There’s usually a sense of justice, fate, irony, or redemption.

This structure was no accident. Harvey understood how people listen, and more importantly, why people listen. He didn’t just tell you what happened. He withheld the obvious until it would land with maximum impact.

Why It Worked So Well

Harvey’s genius was in the setup. He trusted the intelligence of his audience. He guided us with breadcrumbs, letting us build assumptions—only to gleefully knock them over at the end.

He leveraged:

  • Suspense through omission
  • Familiarity cloaked in unfamiliarity
  • Emotional resonance through the unexpected
  • A moral twist embedded in fact

He also knew how to perform a story—his pacing, tone, and silences were part of the storytelling. A well-timed pause said more than a paragraph ever could.

Greatest Hits from “The Rest of the Story”

Here are a few classic Paul Harvey closers. (Spoilers ahead!)

  • A young boy with a stutter who found his voice onstage—James Earl Jones.
  • A failed artist who became the world’s most famous cartoonist—Walt Disney.
  • The man who couldn’t afford college, so he audited classes—William Hewlett, co-founder of Hewlett-Packard.
  • The boy kicked out of school for poor learning—Thomas Edison.

Each story was true. Each one held a lesson. And each left the listener with a sense of awe: Wait… really? That was who?

Now think of the emotional arc in those tales—curiosity, empathy, admiration. That’s what made Harvey unforgettable.

What Writers Can Learn From Paul Harvey

If you’re writing novels, short stories, true crime, memoirs, or blog posts, the Paul Harvey method has gold to offer. Here’s how to apply it:

  1. Start with the Setup, Not the Star

Instead of opening with the known, open with the unknown. Create a character or situation that invites questions. Let the reader lean in, not back.

  1. Use Withholding as a Tool

You don’t have to reveal everything up front. Create tension by what you don’t say. Let the reader work a little. We love to fill in blanks.

  1. Save the Reveal

That final “aha” moment—that’s your money shot. Whether it’s in the climax of your thriller or the final line of your blog post, hold back until it counts.

  1. Layer with Moral Resonance

Harvey’s stories were often about perseverance, redemption, or ironic justice. That’s the stuff readers remember. Don’t preach. Just infuse meaning.

  1. Let Style Be the Vehicle

Paul Harvey’s voice was unmistakable—rhythmic, quirky, personal. As writers, we all have a voice. Don’t sand it down. Sharpen it.

And Finally… the Rest of This Story

There’s something timeless about what Paul Harvey gave us. He didn’t just relay facts—he made us feel them. In a world that’s more crowded, distracted, and cynical than ever, the ability to pause a reader and make them say, “Wow… I didn’t see that coming”—that’s real storytelling.

So what happened to The Rest of the Story after Paul Harvey passed in 2009?

Here’s the kicker: The show continued briefly with his son, Paul Harvey Jr., but never quite recaptured the magic. Why?

Because Paul Harvey wasn’t just a format. He was the story.

And now you know… the rest of the story.

Kill Zoners – Who around here is young enough to remember Paul Harvey? If you do, what was your favorite episode? Mine was the story of the recycled timbers in a New England barn being traced as originating from the scrapped ship, Mayflower.

The Top Ten Tactics for Writers Using ChatGPT – Without Losing Your Voice

As writers, we’ve all seen, heard, tasted, felt, and smelt the buzz around AI tools—particularly ChatGPT—being able to crank out content at lightning speed. But that’s not what serious writers care about. We don’t want robotic fluff, and we sure as hell don’t want our voice flattened into some generic echo of internet-speak.

What we do want is to write better, write smarter, and keep our voice intact.

I’ve been working closely with ChatGPT for around two years now—really working with it and producing content for the film industry—and what I’ve found is that it’s not a threat to creativity. Used right, Chat is a force multiplier. A powerful thinking partner. A digital editor that never sleeps. And if you do the dance right, it’ll help you waltz out some pretty awesome moves—without anyone guessing a machine was in the lead.

What Exactly Is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) computer and algorythm machine developed by the OpenAI company based in Silicon Valley. It’s a general pre-trained transformer (GPT) programmed on massive amounts of digital text—books, websites, conversations—to predict what words logically come next in a sentence, a paragraph, or an entire volume of works. That’s the stupid version.

The smart version? Chat is a tool that can:

  • Outline your stories
  • Research topics instantly
  • Draft articles or posts
  • Suggest creative titles
  • Assist with your novels
  • Build your characters
  • Punch up dialogue
  • Analyze your plot
  • Summarize chapters
  • Rephrase clunky paragraphs
  • Ask tough questions you hadn’t thought of
  • And most importantly, learn your unique voice over time

But here’s the kicker. ChatGPT doesn’t know truth. It doesn’t “think” like we do. It’s not sentient. It reflects probabilities and recognizes patterns from information or prompts fed into it. Which means you have to be the discerning human in the loop.

That’s your job. To guide it. Train it. Push back. Sharpen it into something useful.

With that, let’s get real about how to effectively exploit this big, bad, and beautiful bot.

Ten Real-World Tactics to Use ChatGPT Like a Pro Writer

These aren’t tips you’ll get from a “101 Ways to Prompt ChatGPT” article. These are hard-learned, field-tested tactics I use every day.

1. Feed It Your Work. Literally.

Want ChatGPT to sound like you? Give it samples of your writing. Paste in 2–3 blog posts or several book chapters and say: “This is my writing voice. Learn it. From now on, respond in this style.” It will. And it gets better over time. In fact, it can be downright spooky.

2. Talk To It Like a Writing Partner.

Don’t treat it like Google. Have a back-and-forth. Ask it what’s missing from your argument. What’s weak. Where the tension drops. “What’s the most compelling way to open this post?” “Challenge this idea. Where could I be wrong?” It becomes a live writing room, not a vending machine.

3. Use It for Reverse Outlining.

Paste in a rough draft and ask: “Summarize the structure. What’s the logical flow?”
This reveals hidden structure—or lack thereof—and shows where to tighten or reorder.

4. Rapid Rewriting at Scale.

Stuck on a paragraph? Ask: “Rewrite this in plainer English.” “Make this sound like Hemingway. Or like Garry Rodgers.” Use what works, ditch what doesn’t. It’s a revision shotgun.

5. Create Better Metaphors.

ChatGPT is surprisingly sharp with metaphor. Ask: “Give me three metaphors to describe the writing process.” You’ll be amazed what turns up—and one might be gold.

6. Simulate Your Audience.

Ask it to act like a reader of The Kill Zone or your novel’s target demographic. “What would a thriller reader think of this twist?” “What questions might a new writer have after reading this post?” It helps you pre-empt confusion.

7. Build a Persistent Memory.

If you’re using ChatGPT-4o with memory turned on, it can remember your preferences, style, and ongoing projects. This makes it less like a tool—and more like a silent writing partner who gets you.

8. Run “What’s Missing?” Checks.

Paste your article in and ask: “What ideas did I leave out that would make this stronger?” It’ll surface blind spots you didn’t know you had.

9. Draft Titles and Hooks on Command.

Don’t burn out trying to come up with snappy titles or email subject lines. Ask: “Give me 10 strong, punchy titles based on this content.” Keep the good ones, toss the rest. No ego involved.

10. Never Let It Publish Without You.

This one’s crucial. ChatGPT can help you draft. It can help you edit. It can even ghostwrite if you really want. But never hit “publish” until you—the writer—the human element—have done the final pass. Use your judgment. Your voice. Your standards. The machine assists, but the mortal decides.

Final Word

Writers who embrace this technology—without surrendering to it—are bound to outpace those who ignore it or fear it. AI won’t replace us. (At least not yet.) But writers who know how to use AI well will inevitably rise above, and possibly replace, writers who don’t.

Treat ChatGPT like a sharp, tireless apprentice. Not a ghostwriter. Not a gimmick. But a collaborative tool to help you write with more clarity, more insight, and yes—more you.

Kill Zoners—What do you think about ChatGPT and AI in general? Do you use an AI bot such as Chat in your research and writing? And who do you think wrote this post—ChatGPT or Garry Rodgers?

The Creepy Case of the Floating Feet

Between 2007 and 2016, sixteen disarticulated human feet encased in running shoes were found washed up on Pacific Ocean tidal shores in northwest Washington State’s Puget Sound and the southwestern British Columbia Gulf Islands. It’s also known as the Salish Sea.

Theories of dark and sinister forces emerged. A foot-fetish serial killer? A podiatrist cult ritual? A prank pod of kinky killer whales?

The truth, it turns out, was stranger than fiction. And it happened at a time I was a coroner tasked with investigating unexplained human deaths in this jurisdiction.

When I first began contributing to the Kill Zone, Thursdays were marked as true crime sessions. I’ve deviated from that to all sorts of topics I thought would interest readers but, today, I’ve returned to the roots. And rather than rewriting an evergreen post, I’m simply sharing a link to the article I wrote on my home website at www.DyingWords.net. Over the years, this piece has been reproduced by many online agencies including the Huff Post where I once was a regular contributor.

So, if the Creepy Case of the Floating Feet intrigues you, here’s the facts of what happened and why it happened. https://dyingwords.net/the-creepy-case-of-the-floating-feet/

 

Is This Writing Good?

I’m always intrigued when I hear someone say, “That was a really good book” or “This is great writing.” I’ll ask, “What makes it so?” Inevitably, I’ll get varied answers.

Probably the first response is, “Because I liked it.” Or, “Because it held my interest.” Or, “I could hear the voice as if it were talking directly to me.” Or, “It made a lot of sense.”

One of the greatest compliments a writer can get is, “I couldn’t put it down.” I’ve had a few of these over the years, and they really made my day. The best one was, “You. You kept me awake until four in the morning, and I had to go to work the next day.”

So, what makes writing good? I stumbled upon a meme the other day that made me reflect on what good writing is. Timeless storytelling techniques that still hold true and probably outclass most of what is taught to, and produced by, modern scribes.

It was a page by JRR Tolkien, the father of modern fantasy, who wrote The Hobbit in 1937 and The Lord of the Rings trilogy in 1954-1955. I read it and reread it, paying attention to what Tolkien was pulling off. Here’s the image.

I’m not going to critique Tolkien, but I see touches I would have never considered.

Like using an exclamation point in the middle of a sentence. Repeating a sentence in the same paragraph but reframing it in backdrops. A single sentence of three repeated words…

World building… invented languages… unique and memorable character development… superb, captivating storytelling…

I can’t accurately explain why I think Tolkien was a good writer. It’s like Supreme Court Judge Potter Stewart said in his landmark ruing on obscenity, “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it (pornography) when I see it.

Kill Zoners — What are your thoughts on this Tolkien page? And what makes for good writing? BTW, you might have to open the page image in a separate tab to enlarge it for clarity.

The Diary of a CEO

Steven Bartlett is an interesting young guy, He’s a self-made, multi-millionaire entrepreneur and host of a highly popular podcast called The Diary of a CEO. Recently, he released a book with the same title, subtitled The 33 Laws of Business and Life.

I just read Bartlett’s book, and I can say it’s no run-of-the-mill motivational, self-help spiel that promotes the law of attraction, manifestation, and unicorn-inflated fairy fluffs. This is an outlier look at what works and what doesn’t work. And there’s good stuff in here for writers.

Here’s the jacket copy:

Steven Bartlett has never been one to follow conventional rules. He’s achieved extraordinary success and emerged as one of the greatest marketing minds of our time by doing things differently. But there is a method to his maverick style.​

Between founding and running a global digital marketing agency, investing in over forty companies, creating a hit podcast, and launching a venture fund for minority businesses, Bartlett has learned valuable lessons about success and failure, discovering a set of principles that he uses to guide him on his journey from strength to strength.​

In The Diary of a CEO, he presents these thirty-three fundamental laws for the first time. Inspired by his own experience, rooted in psychology and behavioral science, and drawn from the conversations he’s had on his podcast with the world’s most successful entrepreneurs, entertainers, artists, writers, and athletes, these laws will ensure excellence and help you take real steps toward achieving your most daring goals.

From the power of ‘leaning into bizarre behavior’ to learning to ‘out-fail the competition’ to ‘never asking for consensus on creativity’ to ‘making pressure your privilege’ to understanding why ‘you must be an inconsistent leader,’ Bartlett provides counterintuitive and fresh insights to lead you on the path to success.

These laws will stand the test of time and will help anyone master their life and unleash their potential, no matter the field.

There’s a lot to digest in this work. A lot to ponder, and a lot to make you say, “That’s a different way to look at it.” But there’s one law (#27) that hit home for me as a writer.

It’s The Discipline Equation: Death, Time, and Discipline. This law teaches you how to be disciplined in anything you set your mind to through a simple “discipline equation”, and why discipline is the ultimate secret to being successful in any ambition we have. Like writing.

Discipline involves the strict allocation of time—the one resource we all have equally in a day, a month, a year. Bartlett uses an analogy called Time Betting where we’re issued poker chips of time blocks and can bet (gamble) upon the results of how we use them. He does this to make you realize how vitally important, precious, and valuable each chip—each minute and hour of your day—truly is.

Setting aside Bartlett’s figure that the average person spends 3.15 hours per day on their smartphone, he offers an intriguing formula for discipline:

Discipline = Value of Goal + Reward of Pursuit – Cost of Pursuit

Bartlett says that success is not complicated, it’s not magic, and it’s not mystery. Luck, chance, and fortune may give you a wonderful tailwind, but the rest will be a byproduct of how you choose to use your time. Most of it hinges on finding something that captivates us enough to persevere daily and use a goal that resonates profoundly enough to remain steadfast in our pursuit.

Success, especially writing success, is the embodiment of discipline—though it may not be easy, its core principles are beautifully simple.

Kill Zoners — Thoughts?

Conversations With the Dead

“To attain wisdom, you must converse with the dead.” ~Pythia at the Oracle of Delphi to Zeno of Citium

On the surface, that’s a strange statement. It’s downright weird and completely impossible if taken literally. But I don’t think the Pythia at the Oracle meant this as anything but a metaphor or aphorism. I think she simply advised Zeno to gain knowledge by reading the words of long-gone writers.

Zeno of Citium (334-262 BC) was the founder of stoic philosophy. A literate man of his time, Zeno was a Cypriot merchant who suffered a shipwreck, lost everything, and washed up on the Greek shores near Athens. He found his way to the Agora (market) and into a bookshop where he discovered the recordings of Socrates.

Zeno was deeply moved by Socratic logic and critical thinking skills. This led him to start a school of wisdom and teach his ideas to students in the Stoia Poikile (Painted Porch) in the center of the market. Zeno’s followers were called the Stoicoi, now known as Stoics.

One of Zeno’s fact-finding trips was to the Grecian city of Delphi on the slopes of Mount Parnassus. Here was the Temple of Apollo where the Pythia at the Oracle of Delphi—a revered and sacred high priestess—channeled messages from the gods to mortal humans. Ancient Greeks believed the Oracle, hosting the Pythia, was the very navel (omphalos) of the world and a spiritual axis through which mortals could consult the divine.

The Oracle’s historic visitors included kings, generals, and philosophers covering hundreds of years. Thought leaders from across the Mediterranean pilgrimaged to Delphi where the Pythia rambled trance-like riddles to be interpreted by the truth seekers. According to a National Geographic special, the Oracle was a rock fissure that emitted psychoactive vapors and that the Pythia was, in fact, quite stoned when she uttered inspirations.

Regardless of the truth of the trance, it’s well recorded that Zeno was at the Oracle of Delphi around 300 BC and received his cryptic message, “To attain wisdom, you must converse with the dead.”

There is profound wisdom in this message when you consider it objectively. Learning from those who’ve gone before us is a powerful life tool. Take the inscriptions (translated into English) in the architrave of the Temple of Apollo entrance:

Know Thyself” — a call to self-knowledge and humility.

Nothing in Excess” — a warning about hubris.

Surety Brings Ruin” — a caution about overconfidence.

The Oracle of Delphi symbolized a truth that transcends time. Wisdom doesn’t come from answers alone. Wisdom arises from the questions we dare to ask and the honesty with which we face ourselves. Such as having conversations with the dead.

Personally, I’m thinking of two deceased men I can gain wisdom from. I have, but have never read, the memoirs of Winston Churchill and Dwight D. Eisenhower that I inherited from my father. This post motivates me to dig in.

Kill Zoners — What books do you recommend we read that are wise conversations with the dead?