by Debbie Burke
Most people are familiar with “fight or flight” response to a threat. Physiologist and Harvard Medical School chair, Walter Bradford Cannon isolated those two reactions in the 1920s after observing animals in the lab. When animals were frightened or under stress, they displayed behaviors that evolution had programmed into them millions of years before for survival. Faced with a threat, animals either stood their ground and fought the attacker or ran away from it.

Photo credit: Bernard Dupont CC by SA 2.0
Our human ancestors developed the same programming. They either grabbed a big stick to fight off the lion or they ran like hell to escape it.
These physiological reactions are involuntary, triggered by the autonomic nervous system. Signs include dilated pupils, heightened hearing, racing heart, rapid breathing, and tense muscles to prepare the body to fight or run away.
“Freeze” is a third possible reaction to threats and wasn’t widely recognized untill the 1970s. Its evolutionary purpose may have been to avoid attracting the attention of a predator. If the prey didn’t move, the predator would hopefully not notice it and walk on by.

Public domain photo
I’ve watched young fawns remain completely still to blend in with cover. However, when deer freeze in the headlights of your speeding car, that option often doesn’t work out well for survival.
Recently I learned about a fourth reaction: fawn. The term was coined by psychotherapist Pete Walker in 2003 to describe behavior intended to appease the threat and avoid being harmed.

Photo credit: Andrew Lorenz CC by SA 3.0
For instance, dogs may roll on their backs and display their bellies to acknowledge the dominance of another dog. Crouching and cowering are also signs of fawning.
This reaction is often seen in human abuse victims who try to please or show subservience to a potential attacker to deflect violence. They also may agree with the threatening person, hoping to head off an argument that could lead to possible abuse.
This article by Olivia Guy-Evans describes physical responses that occur in the body during fight, flight, freeze, or fawn.
While fight, flight, and freeze are instinctual, fawn is a learned behavior, according to Shreya Mandal JD, LCSW, NBCFCH. When faced with chronic stress and threat, some people develop the fawn reaction to survive.
In a June 2025 article in Psychology Today, she writes:
“Rooted in complex trauma, the fawn response emerges when a person internalizes that safety, love, or even survival depends on appeasing others, especially those who hold power over them. It is a profound psychological adaptation, often shaped in childhood, in homes where love was conditional, inconsistent, or entangled with emotional or physical threat.
“For many survivors, especially those from marginalized communities, fawning becomes a deeply embodied pattern. As a trauma therapist and legal advocate, I’ve witnessed this adaptive strategy in clients across many settings: survivors of interpersonal violence, those navigating carceral systems, immigrants shaped by colonial legacies, employees navigating toxic work environments, and children of emotionally immature parents. The fawn is the child who learns to become invisible or overly helpful to avoid punishment. It’s the adult who minimizes their needs in relationships. It’s the employee who fears negative consequences and retaliation. It’s the incarcerated woman who apologizes before speaking her truth in court.”
The person may not consciously be aware of what they are doing. They simply understand they will “stay safe by pleasing the powerful.”
As crime writers, we often put our characters in conflict with others. When you write these scenes, try viewing them through the lens of what Pete Walker calls the “four Fs.”
Do they fight the threat?
Do they flee?
Do they freeze in their tracks?
Do they fawn to appease the attacker?
Their reactions depend on their individual personalities and psychological makeup. Often their behavior is shaped by childhood trauma that conditioned their responses to conflict.
If you’re not sure how your character would react to peril, try writing short sample scenes. In the first example, have them fight. In the second, they flee. In the third, they freeze. In the fourth, they fawn. Which of the four scenes seems the most authentic for your character’s personality and background?
Another prompt to develop your character is to put them in a risky situation and free-write what they do. They may surprise you by reacting in a way you didn’t expect. A character you thought was timid may stand their ground and put up a ferocious fight. A blustering, aggressive character may freeze or fawn when faced with actual danger.
When a character surprises you, dig deeper into the reasons behind their action. Were they the only defense between their younger sibling and an abusive parent? Were they punished without reason or treated unjustly? Did they resolve to never be put in a submissive position again?
Short writing prompts like these help you get to know your character and learn how they react under stress. Their background may not be shown in the story but you, as the author, will better understand how to portray them in an authentic, realistic way.
~~~
TKZers: When confronted with danger, does your main character fight, flee, freeze, or fawn?
~~~
Debbie Burke’s new book The Villain’s Journey-How to Create Villains Readers Love to Hate is now for sale in hardcover, as well as ebook and paperback.
Stockholm Syndrome falls under the fawn strategy.
“Stockholm Syndrome is a form of reverse projection . . . The Guardienne protects captives or people being abused by projecting the abuser’s image back at them, trying to resemble them as much as possible. This is an automatic survival mechanism wherein the Guardienne creates a new persona that skillfully mimics the behavior of the captors.”―Why Alcoholics Relapse: The Guardienne Concept, Pg 38
This explains how Patty Hearst could be an armed participant in a bank robbery as “Tania” weeks after being kidnapped by the SLA in 1974. Hearst’s Guardienne instinctively emulated the kidnappers’ behavior with the objective of making them think she was “one of them.”
J, thanks for adding the info on the Stockholm Syndrome. I remember at the time of the Hearst kidnapping wondering what possessed her to join the SLA. You explained that well.
Modern research has a better name for the Stockholm Syndrome. Incredibly bad police work. The “syndrome” was coined and used to not believe women.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18028254/
You obviously haven’t any idea what Stockholm Syndrome is. Your reference, in fact, does what you erroneously claim Stockholm Syndrome does.
The sample scene suggestion is an excellent one, Debbie! As is the free-write. I’ve had very interesting results with both. Characters often do react in surprising ways, giving me added nuance that prevents the dreaded “cardboard character” syndrome.
Cyn, so glad the prompts helped. My characters often surprise me when they get the bit in their teeth and start running. I just hold on and enjoy the ride.
Gordon’s the Chief of Police. He’s going to fight, but he’ll also try to defuse a violent situation because he’d rather not fight if he doesn’t have to. (Avoids a lot of paperwork.)
Terry, Gordon is nothing if not pragmatic! That’s one reason he’s so likable.
The fight or flight response is one of the hardest things I had to teach new pizza drivers. We were fearless. We drove pizzas into neighborhoods the police don’t go in. We did it without Kevlar or handguns.
But new drivers were taught. If it doesn’t feel right, drive to a safe spot and start checking. Many, many times I or one of my co-workers avoided a very bad outcome by going with that feeling that it wasn’t right.
That fear or flight response? You are here today because your distant relative decided not to play with the saber toothed kitty. Follow their lead.
Alan, as you say, instincts and gut feelings are built into our DNA to protect us. Glad you trained others how to protect themselves. And stay safe yourself!
“We drove pizzas into neighborhoods the police don’t go in.”
I don’t think I have told this story.
I am the father of college students. Well one has graduated. They went to a Transylvania University in Lexington, KY. Elaine Vienats was kind enough to write Transylvania into Dead of Night. Like many urban colleges, the neighborhood around Transylvania is “marginal”.
Child and their friends were walking home from the bars one night. Lexington PD rolled up to check on them. When my child unfolded their arms, their Maglite came into view.
“What is that?” the officer asked.
“My flashlight. My daddy gave it to me.”
“The City won’t let us carry those. Why did he give you that.”
“Daddy delivers pizza. He said always bring your own light. He learned to deliver in Ferguson.”
“Ferguson?”
“Yes that Ferguson.”
“Have a nice night ladies.”
Alan, great illustration of the best defense is a good offense. Maglites might not be considered the most glamorous gift by your child’s peers but they sure will stick close to her when they’re in risky situations.
He said always bring your own light.
I really like that. Applies to life in many other ways other than flashlights.
🙂
Here’s another survival F. Fornicate.
Good one, Marilynn!!!
Great idea for writing prompts, Debbie. I’ve had characters react in different ways. (Sometimes there’s no option. It’s run or die!)
Live to fight another day is sometimes the best choice, all right, Kay.
What’s esp. fun is when characters don’t react the way you expect them to.