Can You Spot The Errors?

by James Scott Bell
@jamesscottbell

board-361516_1280

I’ve had to take care of some life matters this week, so I’m going to re-post a little “test” I once posted. Time to play again!

Below is a bit of writing I made up based on errors I see all the time in manuscripts and published (even traditionally!) books. Heck, I’ve been guilty at one time or another, especially in my early years. Some of these are technically not “errors,” as they may be grammatically correct. But they’re what I call “little writing speed bumps.” They disturb the reader’s fictive dream, usually in a subconscious way. The more bumps, the less enjoyable the reading experience.

Learn to spot them in your own writing, however, and you can smooth out the road.

So here we go. Read the following and jot down all the speed bumps you can find. Don’t look ahead to the answer sheet yet. You’re on the honor system!

John Harper gazed out the window at his Christmas present.

He gazed at a beautiful boat.

“How do you like it?” his wife said. Carol was dressed in a red sweater.

Carol luxuriated in the softness of the sweater. Her smile was soft and warm.

John turned from the window and embraced his wife.

“I can see you do,” Carol laughed.

Kissing Carol full on the mouth, John whispered, “I like you even more.”

Carol Harper was forty-two. A graduate of Bryn Mawr, she had studied folklore and mythology, before finally deciding to major in business. Her first job out of college was with an advertising firm in New York.

“I like you too,” Carol said lovingly.

“I like you so much,” John repeated, “that I want to take you out to a nice dinner tonight.”

“A nice dinner, John?” Carol expostulated. “Tonight?”

“Yes,” John winked. “Tonight.”

How’d you do, class? Now, take this quiz home to your parents and return it with a note saying they’ve seen it …

… or not. Below is the excerpt with my answers provided. Some of them have footnotes that you can read below the excerpt. Have a look, then open up a discussion in the comments.

John Harper gazed out the window at his Christmas present.

He gazed [ECHO. SEE NOTE 1, BELOW] at a beautiful boat.

“How do you like it?” his wife said. Carol was dressed in a red sweater. [POV PROBLEM. WE’RE IN JOHN’S HEAD. HOW CAN HE SEE HIS WIFE’S OUTFIT IF HE’S LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW?]

Carol luxuriated [POV SWITCH TO CAROL] in the softness of the sweater. Her smile was soft [ECHO] and warm. [POV PROBLEM. WHO SEES THIS? NOT HER. SHE’S NOT LOOKING IN A MIRROR, AND NOT JOHN, WHO IS LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW]

John turned from the window and embraced his wife.

“I can see you do,” [HOW? HE’S EMBRACING HER] Carol laughed [YOU DON’T LAUGH DIALOGUE. SEE NOTE 2]

Kissing Carol full on the mouth, John whispered [HOW CAN JOHN WHISPER ANYTHING IF HE’S FULL ON THE MOUTH? SEE NOTE 3], “I like you even more.”

Carol Harper was forty-two. [POV SWITCH. THIS IS AN OMNISCIENT VIEW]. A graduate of Bryn Mawr, she had studied folklore and mythology, [MISPLACED COMMA] before finally deciding to major in business. Her first job out of college was with an advertising firm in New York. [ALL THIS IS INFO DUMP AND EXPOSITION. IT CAN WAIT!]

“I like you too,” Carol said lovingly. [ADVERB IS unnecessary. SEE NOTE 4]

“I like you so much [ECHO IN DIALOGUE],” John repeated [REDUNDANT], “that I want to take you out to a nice dinner tonight.”

“A nice dinner, John?” [UNNECESSARY USE OF NAME. SEE NOTE 5] Carol expostulated [I HOPE I DON’T HAVE TO EXPLAIN THIS. BUT SEE NOTE 2 AGAIN]. “Tonight?”

“Yes, [UNNECCESARY FILLER. SEE NOTE 6]” John winked [DIALOGUE DOESN’T WINK!]. “Tonight.” [ECHO]

[FINAL AND MOST IMPORTANT COMMENT: NO CONFLICT OR TENSION ANYWHERE! SEE NOTE 7]

NOTES:

  1. An echo is when a descriptive word (an adjective or verb) is used more than once in close proximity. Here, gazed is used in back-to-back sentences. It’s not “wrong” to do this, but it’s a bump in the reader’s mind.
  1. For attributions in dialogue, use said as your default. Its job is to clue the reader in on who is speaking and nothing more. It’s virtually invisible. If you are tempted to use another word to indicate a manner of speaking, look to the context and seek to make things clear. For example: Sgt. Trask clenched his teeth. “Fall in!” he growled. We know he growled from the context and the exclamation point. We know he is speaking, too. So: Sgt. Trask clenched his teeth. “Fall in!” is enough.
  1. This kind of sentence construction is called a participle phrase. It begins with a word ending in –ing. What you have to watch out for are two actions that defy the laws of physics. In other words, can the two actions take place at the same time? Full-on kissing and whispering cannot (unless you speak fluent French. Ahem). But these two actions can coexist: Getting out of his car, John heard a woman scream. While some writing instructors hold that you should never use a participle phrase. I think they’re just fine if they a) pass the coexistence test; and b) are used sparingly.
  1. Adverbs propping up dialogue attributions are almost always unnecessary. If it’s not clear how something is being said from the dialogue itself, or the action surrounding it, see if you can make it clear. The occasional adverb is fine, but only if you truly need it.
  1. Avoid having characters tell each other things they both already know. The other character’s name is one of these. Unless, of course, the character is trying to be adamant, as in, “John, how many times do I have to tell you not to kidnap the neighbors!” But when you try to slip in exposition in dialogue, it can sound truly phony if it’s information both characters already possess: “Oh hello Arthur, my family doctor from Baltimore. Please come in.”
  1. One of the best ways to make dialogue crisp is to cut needless filler words. Look for these at the start of dialogue, especially Yes, No, and Well. The sentence in the piece would have been much better this way: John winked. “Tonight.” (Why is tonight not an echo? Because John is using it as an echo. It’s intentional.)
  1. The scene is dullsville because there’s no conflict. There should be some tension, any kind, even if it’s only an emotional knot inside one of the characters. Anything that takes the scene south of normal.

John Harper gazed out the window at his Christmas present.

“How do you like it?” his wife said.

John turned from the window and faced Carol.

“I can see you do,” Carol said.

“What’s wrong with your eyesight?” John said.

So what about you? Did you see anything else? What conflict might be added to  improve the scene?

21 thoughts on “Can You Spot The Errors?

  1. Sunday gold, as always. All of these tips are on my watch list. I have a scene that my crit partners are dinging because they don’t think my character can see what he’s describing from his vantage point. I know he can. (I wrote it, didn’t I?) I suck at spatial stuff, and since I can’t include illustrations with circles and arrows, I’m trying to “not” see what’s in my head as I rework the section. Why isn’t there an ESP setting in Word. (Or Scrivener)?

    • Funny (or frustrating) disconnect there, Terry. You can see it…but some readers can’t? Ack…check it one more time then go with your gut!

      ESP…I’m reminded why I failed my metaphysics exam in college. I looked inside the soul of the student sitting next to me. (h/t W. Allen)

  2. Writing errors! They come in so many different guises, and they never stop trying to elbow their way into our work. Diligence and practice are our only weapons.

    • I like that, M.C. Trying to “elbow in.” I also call them sand fleas. After going to the beach, and toweling off, you can still find those pests hiding out. But diligent practice gets them into your brain so you can begin to avoid them from the jump. That process is ongoing.

  3. I agree with Terry and Sue, excellent post to reread.

    Thanks, Jim for the reminders.

    I don’t think I could wait for edits. If I noticed those errors on my following day get-up-to-speed read through, they would have to go. A clean space is…

    • Right, Steve. As I said to Sue, above, I edit the previous day’s pages. I give them a quick run through Pro Writing Aid, which picks up typos and some usage errors. Then back to writing.

      • I do rolling edits, as well, to transport myself back into my story world. Never considered running the previous day’s work through Pro Writing Aid, though. I save that for after I complete the first draft. Hmm…I may try it tomorrow. Thanks for the idea!

  4. Good reminders, JSB. Like Steve, these usually don’t make my next day’s read-over, if they’re ever made in the first place (happily happening less and less over time). Happy Sunday. Beautiful weather here in central Virginia.

    • Thanks, Harald. And it’s a great feeling when you know you’ve grown to a point where the speed bumps happen less and less.

      It’s been pouring in California, which has solved our drought (for the moment). But it’s done some damage in L.A., like a big sinkhole in a major street that TWO cars went down in!

  5. Terrific reminders. These things can creep in during the heat of the draft–I consciously avoid all of them, but echo words in particular can be a scourge.

    Have a fine Sunday. We’re getting pummeled here in western Oregon by yet another aerial river, so things are soggy 🙂

    • Dale, echoes really jolt me when I see them in others’ work. Always pulls me out for a moment. There are times, of course, when you use them intentionally, to make a point, e.g., His burping drove her crazy. Fine. She would eat more onions. If he wanted burping in the house, she was going to give it to him, big time.

      I think I need more coffee…

  6. Great post, Jim. Why?

    Because I laughed all the way through your draft . . . which tells me I’ve learned something about the craft. Not so long ago, I would’ve been scratching my head trying to find the dings. 🙂

    Happy pouring-down-rain Sunday!

  7. As I have said before, it takes talent to purposely write badly. Kudos.

    I hate the word “gaze.” Just saying…

    • LOL, Kris. That would make a good post. What words or phrases do we hate in fiction?

      Here’s one: “I love you.” Overused. Empty. Ham fisted. Virtually meaningless. There are so many other ways to say it, and more important, show it!

    • Intriguing, Kris! Is that a hate of the noun or the verb?
      I ask from both professional curiosity and personal enrichment. I use “gaze” as a noun often simply because using “eyes” causes all manner of issues (those traveling body parts have been discussed often here at TKZ! Haha!)

      And I think the post prompt is a great idea, JSB!

Comments are closed.