Time of Death Done Right

Time of Death, Done Right: What Really Sets the Window

By Jennifer Dornbush

Somewhere on a crime show on television tonight, a medical examiner will dutifully glance at a body and announce that death occurred at precisely 10:42 p.m. It is a great dramatic dialogue line. It is also pure fiction, because it teaches readers and writers to expect a precision the science cannot offer. The truth is more interesting and far more useful at the writing desk. Estimating time of death is the careful art of reading a window of time.

I grew up around this work. My father was a medical examiner whose office was in our home, so I learned early that estimating time of death means reading several clocks at once, none of which keeps perfect time. This is how it actually works, and how to put it on the page so your scene earns a reader’s trust.

The body keeps several clocks

Forensic pathologists lean first on three classic post-mortem changes, often called the triad: algor mortis, rigor mortis, and livor mortis. Each one tracks a different process of body decomposition, and each is most useful in the early window of estimating time of death. This triad roughly occurs within the first three days after death, which is when most cases are actually examined. After that, the next stages of decomposition take over and that window of time estimate opens wide. Read together and against the scene, these three signs let an examiner narrow the time of death window. Read carelessly, they mislead. Learn the difference and hone your crime story craft.

Algor mortis: the cooling curve

Algor mortis is the body cooling toward the temperature of its surroundings once it stops regulating its own heat. The rule of thumb many writers have heard is a drop of about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit per hour, close to one degree Celsius. That number is a starting point, and a shaky one on its own. Cooling depends on the air temperature, the body’s size, what it is wearing, body composition (fat), and whether it is in water or on cold tile or under blankets. A small, lean body in a cold room loses heat fast. A larger, more dense body under covers in a warm house holds it.

This is exactly why a careful examiner reaches past the rule of thumb to a tool like the Henssge nomogram, which factors in ambient temperature, body mass, and correction factors. For your fiction, the takeaway is simple and powerful: cold changes everything. A death in a freezing setting, the kind of subzero scene at the heart of Frozen Lives, slows the cooling clock and stretches the window wide. Your investigator should say so.

Rigor mortis: the stiffening clock

Rigor mortis is the stiffening that sets in as muscles are cut off from the living energy they need to stay relaxed. The classic progression begins about two hours after death, often first in the small muscles of the face, then spreads over the next several hours and reaches its full hold between roughly six and twelve hours. It stays for about half a day more and then eases as the tissue begins to break down, usually releasing across the following day or so.

Those numbers are only estimates and move with conditions the body is exposed to. Heat speeds rigor along, cold slows it, and heavy exertion right before death can bring it on faster. There is also a dramatic edge case worth a writer’s attention: cadaveric spasm, a sudden stiffening of the hands at the very moment of death that can leave a victim gripping a weapon or a fistful of fabric. It is rare and debated, and used sparingly it can give a scene a memorable, grounded detail.

Livor mortis: the story gravity tells

Livor mortis, also called lividity, is the settling of blood in the direction of gravity (aka: the lowest parts of the body once the heart stops moving it). It begins to show within the first hour or two as a reddish-purple staining in the dependent areas, deepens over the next several hours, and becomes fixed somewhere in the range of eight to twelve hours, after which it no longer shifts. Before it fixes, pressing a thumb on the skin pushes the blood aside and leaves a pale blanch. After it fixes, the mark stays.

Lividity is a gift to mystery writers, because it tells you about position, not only time. If the pattern of settled blood does not match the way a body is lying, the body was moved after death. That single observation has launched a thousand plots, and it is true to life. An examiner who finds lividity on the back of a victim discovered face-down knows the scene has been staged, and so does your detective.

When the triad runs out

The three classic signs carry the early window. Beyond it, the examiner turns to other clocks. Stomach contents can suggest how long after a known meal death occurred, though digestion is too variable to pin down tightly. The potassium level in the vitreous fluid of the eye rises in a fairly predictable way and can extend the useful window. As decomposition advances, forensic entomology takes over, reading the life cycles of the insects that colonize remains to estimate a longer interval. None of these is a stopwatch, so the honest method combines them, weighs each against the scene and any witness timeline, and reports a range.

Putting it on the page

The craft of it comes down to this. Let your investigator give a window with a reason behind it. “Based on body temperature and the early stage of rigor, I’d estimate she died between roughly ten last night and two this morning, and the cold room could push that later.” That line does three things at once. It sounds like real expertise, it builds in the uncertainty that good investigators carry, and it hands your plot a flexible timeline you can tighten with other clues.

The mistake to avoid is false precision. The 10:42 p.m. announcement closes a door your story wants open. A stated range, with the confounders named, keeps the mystery alive and makes your detective look smarter, because explaining why the window is wide is what real expertise sounds like. Dr. Emily Hartford works exactly this way across The Coroner’s Daughter series, giving ranges and reasons rather than tidy timestamps. Besides, ranges leave room for doubt. Doubt is the seed to obstacles. Obstacles are how you test and challenge your heroine.

If you want a deeper field guide to details like my Crime Writer’s Toolkit gathers the forensic tools writers reach for most.

A body is a clock that runs fast and slow at once, and reading it is a skill, not a guessing game. Write it that way, with a window and a reason, and your crime story will hold up under any reader who knows the difference.

Jennifer Dornbush is an author, screenwriter, and forensic specialist who brings crime stories to life with authenticity and heart. WALKING ON WHITE, is the latest novel in The Coroner’s Daughter mystery series. With a background rooted in real-world forensics and a passion for crafting unforgettable mysteries, Jennifer offers readers and viewers a front-row seat to the intersection of science, justice, and human nature. Jennifer’s crime expertise has made her a sought-after speaker, consultant, and educator. Through her webinars and master course, WRITING THE KILLER CRIME SERIES, Jennifer guides writers in melding suspenseful storytelling with forensic realism to the screen and page. Join her community at http://www.jenniferdornbush.com/

Sources

StatPearls, “Methods of Estimation of Time Since Death.”

StatPearls, “Algor Mortis.”

“Current Understanding and Future Research Direction for Estimating the Postmortem Interval” (systematic review).

American Military University, “How to Estimate Time of Death Using Algor Mortis.”

Greatest Hits from the 2024 Flathead River Writers Conference Part 1

2024 Flathead Writers Conference
Photo credit: David Snyder

by Debbie Burke

@burke_writer

The 34th Flathead River Writers Conference was October 5-6, 2024. The conference is always good, but this year was stellar with superb speakers and enthusiastic interaction among attendees.

As I drafted this post from my notes, it kept growing with more information that needed to be included. As a result, it ran way too long for a single post. So I’m dividing it into two. Today is Part 1 of the greatest hits from the event. Part 2 will follow in a couple of weeks.

~~~

Debra Magpie Earling

Debra Magpie Earling (Native-American author of The Lost Journals of Sacajawea and Perma Red) gave the moving keynote which set the tone that continued through the entire weekend.

Debra opened with a description of “wonder”, which she defined as “surprise mingled with admiration.” She went on to tell a story of wonder about the last Christmas she spent with her dying mother. On a peaceful Montana night, she described their visit as like “being inside a snow globe.”

Her mother said, “When I die, I’ll send you a sign. A hummingbird.” Debra went along with her mom but had her doubts. After all, hummingbirds are common at her home during summer so how would she ever know which one was the sign?

Nevertheless, after her mother passed, the following spring Debra set up many feeders and waited.

It was a strange summer. Other bird species came and went. Crows sat on the feeders. But not a single hummingbird appeared.

On the evening of her mother’s birthday in July, Debra and her husband were sitting outside and Debra said, “Well, I guess she didn’t send the sign.”

At that moment, the only hummingbird of the year appeared. It flew to Debra’s forehead and hovered for a few minutes then left.

Debra and her husband asked each other, “Did you see that? Is that what I think it was?”

With that anecdote, she summed up the magical wonder of storytelling, the conference theme.

While talking about where inspiration comes from, Debra said, “The muse is a lot of dead people who want their stories told.”

That sentence sent chills through me. Recently I’ve considered writing historical fiction. Did Debra send me a sign that it’s time to explore the past?

~~~

Danica Winters

Million-selling Harlequin romantic suspense novelist Danica Winters told the audience, “This is not your grandmother’s bodice ripper.” Romance sales account for an astounding $1.4 billion each year.

Today’s variations are limitless: contemporary, historical, erotica, Young Adult, thriller/suspense, LGBTQ+, dark romance, paranormal, holiday, fantasy/romantasy. Even serious social issues like human trafficking find their way into romances.

Why are they so popular? Danica believes, “They are everyone’s escape. They bring joy and make people laugh. Romance is a promise. We writers are entertainers.”

Danica sells many more paperbacks than ebooks, unlike other genres where ebooks dominate. She added an interesting market detail: When Walmart changed its shelving to hold 6″ by 9″ books, that prompted publishers to shift book production to that same size because Walmart is such a huge market.

While most romance readers are women, Danica said about 20% are men, often in law enforcement and the military. Turns out even alpha males like escape, too.

~~~

Leslie Budewitz

Three-time Agatha winner Leslie Budewitz focused on crime fiction with an excellent summation of differences within the genre.

  • Mystery is “What Happened?”
  • Suspense is “What’s Happening?”
  • Thriller is “What Might Happen?”

Leslie has her finger on the pulse of the cozy market and talked about shifts within the genre, including a new trend of millennial cozies that include some swearing and adult language.

For a cozy, the semiofficial acceptable body count is three. So far, Leslie has only had two murders in one book.

With 19 published books, Leslie must keep track of two amateur sleuth series and multiple standalone suspense novels. She developed an ingenious system to avoid repetition of plots and characters. For each book, she creates a spreadsheet with the following headings:

Victim              Killer/Method             Suspects          Motive            VGR

What is VGR? The Very Good Reason why the amateur sleuth gets involved in a crime.

~~~

Kathy Dunnehoff

Only a truly gifted writing teacher can make grammar entertaining. That describes longtime college instructor Kathy Dunnehoff, author of bestselling romantic comedies and screenplays.

Kathy offered nuts and bolts hacks to improve writing productivity.

  • Measure your success by what you control, not by factors outside your control. Success is the number of words you produce.
  • Use a writing calendar to track production either by word count or minutes…as long as that time is spent actually writing. Watching goat yoga or doomscrolling doesn’t count.
  • When you don’t write, record your excuse in the calendar. Talk about making yourself accountable!
  • Recognize procrastination in its many disguises: research, reorganizing your office, talking about writing rather that writing, etc.
  • When revising, try the “Frankenstein Method” (from Jessica Brody’s Save the Cat Writes a Novel): Start a new document for the second draft, then copy and paste sections from the first draft.
  • There is no extra credit for suffering!

~~~

On Saturday evening, our local indie shop, the BookShelf, hosted a reception for conference attendees and speakers. Gather a bunch of writers in a bookstore and we’re more excited than dogs at the dog park. Even though people mock-complained their brains were overloaded and they were exhausted, no one wanted to leave. All that creative energy kept us buoyed and eager for the following day.

Come back here in two weeks for Part 2 of the Greatest Hits from the Flathead River Writers Conference. Highlights include freelance article writing, side hustles to supplement income from book sales, anatomy of a publicity campaign, and 16 questions an agent asks when assessing a manuscript.

~~~

TKZers: Do any of the ideas mentioned resonate with you? What is your favorite productivity hack?

~~~

Conferences are also a good venue to sell books and I did!

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree, Cover by Brian Hoffman

 

 

Please check out my latest thriller Fruit of the Poisonous Tree at this link.

When the real author disappoints

by Clare Langley-Hawthorne

In the last couple weeks I have watched two movie biopics about famous children’s authors – one was the terribly miscast Miss Potter (about Beatrix Potter) and the other, entitled Enid, was about one of my favorite children’s author, Enid Blyton. The latter was a bit of a shock as Enid herself was not in the least what I expected – and this goes to the heart of my blog post today – how readers’ expectations of what an author is like in real life are rarely borne out.
I had expected Enid Blyton to be an adventurous, maternal, ‘jolly hockey sticks’ sort who loved to play games with her own children and who was just as fun and charming as her books. Boy, was I wrong. She was (assuming the movie depiction is correct) an ambitious, selfish and vindictive woman who couldn’t stand being with her own children except for the one hour a day she allocated to them (nanny had them the rest of the day) before she then packed them off to boarding school. She reminded me of so many brittle, stiff upper lip Englishwomen who secretly despise their own offspring – but (I wailed!) she wrote such lovely children’s books. How could it be?!!!

I was of course mistaking the author for her stories…and who amongst us hasn’t fallen into that trap?
The movie Enid presents a side of the author that I hope my own children (huge Enid Blyton fans) never see. In many ways I think as a reader I prefer not knowing anything about my favorite authors, lest finding out ruins reading their books forever. Since Enid Blyton wrote 750 books over her lifetime (amazing in and of itself!) many a child would have been deprived of her wonderful stories had their parents known the kind of woman she really was (and in some way what does it matter, her books should stand on their own, shouldn’t they?)

So have you met an author only to find your perception of him/her totally dashed because he or she were nothing like what you anticipated- nothing, in fact, like their books at all?

Have any of my fellow Kill Zoners been confronted by a fan who has expressed their own surprise/shock/dismay that the author persona was nothing like what they expected?

To date, I have only encountered fans who tell me I am exactly like they thought I’d be… (I’m not sure what that says about me or my writing!) Nonetheless I found myself lulled into the trap of hoping my childhood literary heroine was just like the girls she wrote about in her books. Sigh. It will be a few weeks before I can pick up one of her books again to read to my sons without feeling disappointment that fiction was so far removed from reality.

ASK ME ANYTHING …AGAIN AND AGAIN


John Ramsey Miller

Most published authors are asked to speak to groups of one sort or another. I am flattered when I am asked to address people who are interested in what I have to say. As I was preparing a yak-up about my work (and authoring in general) I’m going to be giving next week to people gathered up to support a university library, I thought about the most frequent questions I am asked. After addressing non-writers, readers, book lovers, funders and innocent bystanders, there is invariably a Q & A exchange. No matter where I am speaking, or what aspects I blather on about, when it’s time for questions people ask the same ones.


Q: Who are your favorite authors?

A: There are so many I never know where to start. I usually say it depends on the genre and when I read them. Truman Capote, Ken Follett, Frederick Forsythe, Ken Kesey, John Carre, Ira Levin, William Golding, James Brady, William Styron, Mario Puzzo, Willie Morris, Steinbeck, Eudora Welty, J.D. Salinger, J. G. Ballard, John Cheever, Tolkien, James Clavell, Tom Wolfe, Frank Herbert, and then we have contemporary authors, none of whom I can list here without fear of leaving out someone and hurting feelings. There are so many truly great authors out there.



Q: What are your favorite books?

A: IN COLD BLOOD, EYE OF THE NEEDLE, THE GODFATHER, ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST, FRANNY & ZOEY, SOPHIE’S CHOICE, LORD OF THE RINGS, DUNE, NORTH TOWARD HOME, CANNERY ROW, WHY I LIVE AT THE P.O., DOGS OF WAR, SMILEY’S PEOPLE… (Books by the people listed above)



Q:Do you write every day (on a schedule)?

A: Yes, but not always at the keyboard. These days I write when I want or need to.



Q: Where do you get your ideas?

A: Rarely from the same place twice



Q: What is your process?

A: I think a lot. I write. I think a lot more. I write. Like that. Over and over. It’s sort of a cycle that speeds and slows but never stops.



Q: Do you outline or follow characters where they lead you?

A: I never let my characters decide where to take me. I give them a road map and expect them to go exactly where I have made the marks. I am the choreographer. I think it is pretentious to say one’s characters are so alive they take over. As the author, unless you are either in control or on LSD. Your characters are in your imagination and on the page and are not actually alive and acting independent of your mind.



Q: When did you decide to become an author?

A: I have no idea when it started. I have told made-up stories and written since I was very young. Over time I more or less got increasingly familiar with an old friend.


Q: What advice would you give an aspiring author?

A: If you are published, yours will be one of 400,000 books published that year. If you don’t have a way of effectively promoting your book, it will not be widely read.



Q: Do you believe that everybody has at least one book in them?

A: In my experience, yes. And as often as not it’s a very bad book. Most people can start a book, but few have the drive to finish one, and fewer still have any idea how to write effectively. And of the books written only about one to two percent are worth reading. In my experience, the worst are autobiographies of normal people who think their experiences are going to interest other people, followed closely by humorous or inspiring stories they have collected.



Okay gang, are there any others you are asked that I’ve missed?