First Page Critique – Fallen Starr

 

by Debbie Burke

Welcome to another first page submitted by an anonymous Brave Author. Please read then we’ll discuss on the flip side.

 ~~~

Fallen Starr

Thriller

Starr’s gaze followed the barrel of the gun clenched in the mobster’s trembling white-knuckled grip, her eyes crossing from the effort. Deep shadows enveloped her in the narrow alley off St. Petersburg’s Nevsky Avenue, while the dim, jaundiced glow from the solitary streetlight bled into the darkness.

Crumbling brick walls and weathered cobblestones, slick from a recent downpour, boxed her in. Dripping water reverberated into the twilight, interrupted only by the distant cry of some poor soul. Echoes of fading footsteps sparked her fear that someone might stumble into the alley before she got what she wanted.

Her assailant’s eyes widened, pupils blown out to the edges with a glimmer of paranoia, most likely a result of the street drug Krokodil. He blinked slowly as if the action required immense effort, each movement sluggish and delayed. Sweat beaded on his forehead, and his skin glistened under the faint light. As his trigger finger twitched, Starr’s heart hammered against her ribcage as she swallowed a bitter taste of dread.

“Traitor.” His voice dripped with contempt.

That one word pierced harder than it should. Traitor. She could almost laugh at the irony. If the world only knew how far she’d already fallen. As her chosen name suggested, like a falling star, she had blazed a meteoric path from the heavens alongside one-third of the angels who’d foolishly followed Lucifer’s glorious but doomed light. But after her burning descent, her journey had become a slow, winding climb, as she searched for redemption.

“Long is the way and hard that out of hell leads up to light.” John Milton’s epic poem rang in her ears. But right now, she was far from any light.

Starr turned down the corners of her lips and tilted her head. “Traitor? That hurts my feelings.”

It did indeed. In her quest for redemption, she had made tough choices, turning her back on the other fallen angels. Her current situation in this foul alley had sunk to a similar low.

The air was thick with the stench of rancid garbage. Twisted shadows cast by an old wrought-iron fire escape danced across an overturned dumpster spilling its contents onto the cobblestones. The shade of the bars concealed—was that a headless rat?

A writhing heap of maggots feasting on the rodent forced her to part her lips and take shallow breaths through her mouth.

~~~

First off, kudos to the Brave Author (BA) for a clean submission free of typos.

This is a solid action start, landing the reader smack in the middle of a frightening situation. A gun is aimed at the protagonist, brandished by a man who appears to be a twitchy addict.

It’s nighttime and the location is described with an abundance of sensory detail: sights (“jaundiced glow”), touch (slick cobblestones), sound (dripping water reverberating, a cry, fading footfalls), taste (“bitter dread), and smell (“rancid garbage”).

Nevsky Avenue is a good specific detail, but I wondered whether it referred to St. Petersburg in Florida or in Russia. I googled Nevsky Avenue and discovered a live webcam that shows real-time action on the Russian street.

BTW, TKZers, live webcams are helpful tools for writers to visualize locations, as are street views on Google Earth. If you’re unfamiliar with the lay of the land or need to refresh your recollection of a place you visited in the past, check these out.

BA does a good job of grounding the reader in a few paragraphs. We know where and when the action is taking place. There’s an immediate threat—an armed assailant who has a serious beef with the hero.

Starr is not only in physical danger. She describes what may be metaphorical or spiritual danger. She says she’s a fallen angel struggling on a path to redemption. That makes me wonder if the story has fantasy elements, although it’s categorized as a thriller. Mashups between genres can work well and are popular with current readers.

BA has packed a lot into one page and therein lies the problem. It’s too much, too soon.

While attempting to immerse the reader immediately in the story, BA instead threatens to drown us. It felt like trying to drink from a firehose—a cliche but an apt one.

Slow down and dribble information rather than deluge the reader. Make the reader thirsty for more.

My suggestion is to limit descriptions to a couple of senses rather than all five at once. Choose the best image to sum up the setting and delete the rest. It’s night in a dark cobblestone alley after a recent rain, and there’s a headless rat with maggots feasting on it. That does the job. The reader’s imagination fills in the rest.

Strong verbs are generally good, but here they’re overused. In the first two paragraphs: enveloped, bled, boxed, reverberated, sparked. They draw attention to themselves and pull the reader out of the story. Again, choose the best one and skip the rest.

The description of Starr’s assailant also overwhelms the reader with too many details. I suggest you pare it down to the most vivid, telling detail. Here’s a possible rewrite:

His eyes widened, pupils blown out to the edges with a glimmer of paranoia, most likely from a result of the street drug Krokodil, the cheap Russian homebrew version of heroin.

I had to look up Krokodil. It’s apparently common in Russia but not so much in other countries. That’s why I suggest adding a bit more explanation to clarify it’s not just another street drug. It’s somewhat unique to the location and cooked by the user, rather than purchased as a finished product from a dealer.

That detail is important because it makes the reader curious about Starr. How does she know about Krokodil? Is she a user, a dealer, an undercover officer?

The character of Starr as a fallen angel is intriguing but again it’s overdone. Let’s take another look at this paragraph of inner monologue.

That one word pierced harder than it should. Traitor. She could almost laugh at the irony. If the world only knew how far she’d already fallen. As her chosen name suggested, like a falling star, she had blazed a meteoric path from the heavens alongside one-third of the angels who’d foolishly followed Lucifer’s glorious but doomed light. But after her burning descent, her journey had become a slow, winding climb, as she searched for redemption.

How much of this does the reader need to know at this stage of the story? An accusation that she’s a traitor is intriguing. So is that she’s a fallen angel struggling for redemption.

What the world knows about her fall, the significance of her name, a meteoric path with one-third of other fallen angels who followed Lucifer, a burning descent, and a slow, winding climb—all this information can be saved for later.

Simply using dialogue shows enough about her character to make the reader curious.

“Traitor,” he said (get rid of the cliche “dripped with contempt”).

Starr turned down the corners of her lips and tilted her head. “Traitor? That hurts my feelings.”

What is her tone of voice? Is she being sarcastic? Cocky? Trying to provoke him? Saying something, anything to distract him from shooting her?

Instead of overexplaining her guilt complex, keep the reader wondering and turning the page.

“Long is the way and hard that out of hell leads up to light.” John Milton’s epic poem lingered in Starr’s mind. But right now, she was far from any light.

These lines struck me because they establish Starr’s conflict without overwhelming the reader. However, the current placement confuses the reader because it appears to continue earlier dialogue between the assailant and Starr.

What if you used these lines as the opener instead?

It’s a difficult judgment call to choose which details are important enough to be on the first page and which can be saved until later. The goal is to intrigue the reader, to tease them into wanting to learn more, but not overpower them.

Ask yourself: how much does the reader need to know and when do they need to know it? Don’t get rid of extra info. Save it for later. Decide when to slip in a detail here or a hint there.

As you review this page, also watch out for cliches and delete them. White knuckles, sweat beaded on the forehead, heart hammering her ribs, voice dripping with contempt—these don’t add to the story and detract from the interesting fallen angel concept.

Brave Author, please don’t be discouraged by this critique. You have a compelling idea, an unusual, exotic setting, and a character with an immediate problem. You start with dramatic action. Those are all positive qualities.

Please realize you don’t have to explain everything at once. Take your time.

Thank you for submitting this first page and best of luck with your story!

~~~

TKZers: As a reader with fresh eyes, what is your reaction to this page? What suggestions do you have for the Brave Author?

~~~

Debbie Burke’s new reference book The Villain’s Journey-How to Create Villains Readers Love to Hate is now available in print as well as ebook.

Amazon: Print book   Ebook

Barnes & Noble: Print book   Ebook

Apple: Ebook

Kobo: Ebook

This entry was posted in #writetip, first page critique, Writing by Debbie Burke. Bookmark the permalink.

About Debbie Burke

Debbie writes the Tawny Lindholm series, Montana thrillers infused with psychological suspense. Her books have won the Kindle Scout contest, the Zebulon Award, and were finalists for the Eric Hoffer Book Award and BestThrillers.com. Her articles received journalism awards in international publications. She is a founding member of Authors of the Flathead and helps to plan the annual Flathead River Writers Conference in Kalispell, Montana. Her greatest joy is mentoring young writers. http://www.debbieburkewriter.com

10 thoughts on “First Page Critique – Fallen Starr

  1. “As a reader with fresh eyes, what is your reaction to this page? What suggestions do you have for the Brave Author?”

    You’ve hooked the reader with your first sentence, Brave Author. Great idea! Opening in action, as you’ve intended, is always good! I like the setting, too. Rainy nights carry emotional tones nicely. Clean copy is a pleasure to read. Depending on your level of experience, critiques can be painful. They’re just part of the game, something you have to get used to. The faster you learn to learn from them, the faster you’ll grow as a writer.

    Time for suggestions. Your setting is made for action, unlike opening in a restaurant or any sit-down, “talking heads” location. That’s fine. But I’d include something more actiony than eyes crossing, eyes widening, eyes blinking, a finger twitching, and musing about theological poetry. The most actiony thing is the squirming maggots. You may have painted your MC into a corner where the only logical action is either for her to shoot Boris or for him to shoot her, right now.

    Although you’ve hooked the reader at the start, the long, quiet opening with ornate verbiage unhooks them. A guy with a gun drawn and pointed at a traitor is not going to stand there and not shoot. If he doesn’t shoot, you need to show the reader his motivation for not shooting, and soon:

    “Where haff you hidden maps and diagrams, you predatel’?” the man snarled, brandishing his 9mm Grach.

    Consider starting with a chase sequence or with the gun brandishing line.

    [Minor detail: She’d only have to cross her eyes if the gun is less than 10 cm. away from her face.]

    • Good suggestions, J. Your question about why the assailant doesn’t shoot is excellent. He must want something from Starr and needs her alive. Hints like the maps and diagrams you suggested give him a plausible reason not to shoot.

  2. Thanks for submitting, BA. I agree with Debbie’s assessment. And I love your ability to add detail in your writing.

    My first reaction when I read the page was “I’d like the author to get to the point quicker.” For example, I wish the one word dialogue “Traitor” had appeared earlier on the page. And as Debbie mentioned, I was initially confused about WHICH St. Petersburg, but when you mentioned cobblestones in the next paragraph, it became clear. But it does raise a moment of question in the reader’s mind. Would it be better to have the cobblestone reference earlier to take away that momentary pause for the reader? Or do you want that moment of uncertainty about location?

    A few other thoughts:
    Just as an FYI, as a reader I got a bit stopped in my tracks by the “her eyes crossing from the effort” at her gaze following the gun. Thankfully I’ve never been in that situation so maybe your eyes do cross when someone is holding a gun on you a certain way, but it just struck me as odd.

    “She turned down the corners of her lips” – I know what you are trying to convey but physically doing that is much harder than it sounds (or maybe I have an iron face. LOL!)

    I was confused by the reference to the one-third of “angels”. I’m sure interpretation varies by reader’s background, but when someone mentions angels to me I’m thinking in a biblical sense. Here, if the fallen angel reference is intended to be metaphorical, I wonder if it wouldn’t be better to simply be more specific about Starr’s actual situation, rather than being broadly metaphorical (and the metaphorical aspects pressed my patience as a reader). I walked away from the page having absolutely no idea if she was a ‘good guy’ or a ‘bad guy’ or why I should root for her.

    I love the use of detail in this page–it’s just trimming it up and re-organizing it for clarity & getting to the point of the POV character a little quicker that’s needed. Thanks!

    • Brenda, BA should be encouraged by your comments.

      “I walked away from the page having absolutely no idea if she was a ‘good guy’ or a ‘bad guy’ or why I should root for her.”

      Great observation. As a reader, I’ll be patient for a few pages until the author establishes good guy or bad guy. But a reason to root for (or against) Starr needs to be clear as soon as possible.

  3. Brave writer, you have a way with words, and you have talent. That said, if someone on drugs is pointing a gun at you, I don’t think you would be thinking about a poem or being a fallen angel.
    Debbie’s critique is spot on.

    Wishing you the best on your writing journey.

  4. I’m not sure what the story is intended to be. Is it a literary piece or is it a spy-type thriller? Either way, I think you should cut down the flowery language, The action of the story seems to be on pause while we get minute descriptions. In my opinion, less is better, in all phases: description, narrative, and dialogue. Readers tend to be interested in the character and how they act and react. And the why of their actions.
    Finally, the over description takes up space where you could have built suspense, tension. The opening is a time to hook the reader and this didn’t quite hook me. I hope this helps. Clearly you can write. A book that I like is Stein on Writing. it helped me.

  5. Bravo, brave writer, for submitting your first page here. I agree with the suggestions offered by Debbie. Your writing is evocative, and you’ve set up a compelling situation for the reader. As Debbie noted, keep in mind that you don’t have to do everything at once in the opening. It’s a great hook, and left me wanting to see what happened next. I also agree Debbie’s point about moving the quote and mention of Milton’s line to the opening line. Patricia’s right, too, that if you have a gun pointed at you, especially by someone apparently high on drugs, your focus in going to be on immediate threat.

    You can definitely write and create a “hooky” opening, and again, you’ve put us in a tense, intriguing situation. Please keep writing!

Comments are closed.