We’ve discussed in this space before the burden of the Muddled Middle or Page 200 Syndrome, where the writing process gets hopelessly bogged down in critical exposition that is strikingly un-fun. Today, let’s talk about other un-fun writing: I call them transitional scenes.
Say Detective Jones has discovered what he thinks he will turn out to be a key piece of evidence, and he needs to hand deliver it to Dr. Parker to get his input. The transitional scene in this circumstance would be the process by which Jones gets to Parker’s office.
You could just cut to a new scene where the detective and the doc are in mid-conversation, but if this is their first interaction, in medias res could leave the reader unsatisfied. In my style of writing, the reader needs to know the nature of characters’ relationships. Did they go to school together? Do they like each other? What is Detective Jones’s mode of transportation?
Here comes the balance of backstory and data dump. I’ve got to set up the scene without boring the reader. This means doing the reveal in the midst of some kind of intriguing action. I’ve got to reveal backstory without losing momentum on the front story.
Dr. Oscar Parker knew more about art and art thievery than anyone Flannery Jones had ever encountered. The professor’s tastes had always run toward the modern stuff–the random splashes of color and shapes and mis-assigned anatomy that Jones believed were practical jokes inflicted on the snooty rich. Judging from the ornateness of the gold-tipped iron gates that blocked access to his driveway, his expertise had elevated him from geeky eighth grade nose picker to a gentleman of means and influence. As Jones drove into the frame of the CCTV and pushed the button on the intercom, he wondered if he should start with an apology for the swirlies he’d administered back in the day.
The pacing of some stories require that the reader perceive the passage of time. Early in Nathan’s Run, there’s a section where 12-year-old Nathan decides in the morning that he’s going to execute the next part of his plan that night after the sun goes down. Following that decision comes a chapter about the parallel story of the police who are chasing him, but at this point, the cops don’t have a lot to go on, so the plot is dependent upon them acting on what Nathan does, so there’s not a lot for them to do, either. The trick is to keep these characters alive on the page even when they don’t yet have meaningful tasks to perform. Herein lies the beauty of sub-subplots. In the absence of real action, I inserted political turmoil within the police department itself.
Great. Now, that has to somehow payoff later.
Next came a short scene that might have felt like a non-sequitur at first because it introduces an important character who has exactly one very important task to perform within the story. But he can’t just walk onto the page, do his thing, and disappear. He has to feel real. So, Todd first joins the story as a stressed out professional (I forget what his job is) who’s sweating over a very important presentation that he needs to make the next morning. The reader needs to like him, and he needs to have a reason to be awake at a certain hour the next morning to see the thing that then sets the third act in motion.
Back to Nathan. It’s finally time to pull the trigger on him executing his plan. As the eponymous character, though, people want to know what he’s been doing for the past fifteen or twenty pages.
Now, finally, it was time to get the true action of the story moving again.
As I write this blog post, I am in the middle of a multifaceted transition for Scorched Earth, the Jonathan Grave book for 2026. I’ve got a good guy dead, another good guy wounded and in the hospital, a bad guy in a different hospital, while Jonathan and his team are just now in the process of unpacking who is the power behind all of this. In thirty pages or so, the story valve will open wide for about 50 pages.
And then, I’ll arrive at the Muddled Middle and the joy of writing will once again become less joyful. But only for a little while.
What say you, TKZ family? Have you all walked this same walk? Got any tricks to share?
Good information here, Mr. Gilstrap. For me, this was the key point: Great. Now, that has to somehow payoff later.
Since I write in either single POV (my Mapleton Mysteries) or alternating between two protagonists (my romantic suspense books), I have to figure out ways to have things move forward without jumping away to other POV characters. Phone calls, texts, thoughts, discussions have to reveal any “offstage” action to the readers.
This is a great micro-workshop in how to make transitional scenes not only work, but be compelling. Frankly, this is an area I need to improve in my own writing–I tend to avoid transitional scenes and simply jump ahead to the next full scene, but certainly there are times when writing an engaging transitional scene would be helpful.
Mr. Gilstrap, I love hearing just how you keep me so entertained, hour after hour.
The trick is to keep these characters alive on the page even when they don’t yet have meaningful tasks to perform.
It seems that the delicate balance between backstory and action/intrigue is the skill that every author, no matter the genre, needs on the tool belt. (Now, where did I put that dang thing . . .)
Thanks for this post. One for my archives, I think.
John, your example with Dr. Parker and Flannery Jones is the best kind of teaching. I’m much more likely to learn something by example than through explanation. (Show vs Tell?) 🙂
Thanks