By Elaine Viets
What the heck?
Lately, reading has been a painful experience. Especially online. One story after another has some outrage against the language. I wanted to rant like a pedant and point out each mistake, but I showed some self-restraint. After all, pedantry is still outlawed in most southern states.
Instead, I put these errors into a short story. There are at last 30 mistakes in the story. See if you can spot them all.
A Horrifying Tail of Murder and Mutilation
The Corliss boys, Billy and Justin, created a rein of terror in the town of Blister Bend. The thugs would exorcise their ferocious Dobermans in the town square. The snarling dogs were all teeth and mussel. The very site made mothers grab they’re children to protect there tots.
Sherriff Sam Wich said, “The Corlis’s are the most callus outlaws in the county. No regard for anyone’s feelings.”
Deputy D. Awg said, “Billy tried to bribe me when he didn’t break at the red light on Main. Pulled out a hundred-dollar bill and waived it in my face. I said I wasn’t for sail.”
“Billy keeps a loaded weapon on his mantle,” Sheriff Sam said. “What I wouldn’t give to test that. I bet its connected to at least three grizzly murders.”
“Ever thought about going to the staties?” the deputy asked.
The sherrif glared at him. “What good would that do? I should complain to the state troupers? About Billy Corlis? Whose been paying off the Colonial for years? Are you trying to get me killed?”
“Uh, no, sir. I forgot.” The deputy gave him a rueful smile. “I’m sure one of the Corlises will slip up and we’ll catch them.”
Sheriff Sam snorted. But Deputy D. Awg showed real forsight. Less than a week later, he suprised Billy and Justin burying a body at a construction sight on the edge of town. The deputy got the drop on the killers, and handcuffed them both.
Turned out the decreased was the town butcher.
Sherriff Sam arrived on the seen and staired sadly at the dead meet man. “Its a gristly end for a good man,” he said.
Then he growled at the cuffed killers. “But those two . . . Now their an arresting site.”
“Why, Sheriff,” the deputy said. “I had no idea you were homophonic.”
A Horrifying Tail of Murder and Mutilation: The Reveal
The Corliss boys, Billy and Justin, created a rein of terror in the town of Blister Bend. The thugs would exorcise their ferocious Dobermans in the town square. The snarling dogs were all teeth and mussel. The very site made mothers grab they’re children to protect there tots.
Sherriff Sam Wich said, “The Corlis’s are the most callus outlaws in the county. No regard for anyone’s feelings.”
Deputy D. Awg said, “Billy tried to bribe me when he didn’t break at the red light on Main. Pulled out a hundred-dollar bill and waived it in my face. I said I wasn’t for sail.”
“Billy keeps a loaded weapon on his mantle,” Sheriff Sam said. “What I wouldn’t give to test that. I bet its connected to at least three grizzly murders.”
“Ever thought about going to the staties?” the deputy asked.
The sherrif glared at him. “What good would that do? I should complain to the state troupers? About Billy Corliss? Whose been paying off the Colonial for years? Are you trying to get me killed?”
“Uh, no, sir.” The deputy gave him a rueful smile. “I’m sure one of the Corlises will slip and we’ll catch them.”
Sheriff Sam snorted. But Deputy D. Awg showed real forsight. Less than a week later, he suprised Billy and Justin burying a body at a construction sight on the edge of town. The deputy got the drop on the killers, and handcuffed them both.
Turned out the decreased was the town butcher.
Sherriff Sam arrived on the seen and staired sadly at the dead meet man. “Its a gristly end for a good man,” he said.
Then he growled at the cuffed killers. “But those two . . . Now their an arresting site.”
“Jeez, Sheriff,” the deputy said. “I had no idea you were homophonic.”
***
As you probably guessed, most of these mistakes are homophones, words that sound alike but are spelled differently. These words have tripped up many unwary writers:
tail/tale
exorcise/exercise
rein/reign/rain
mussel/muscle
callous/callus
break/brake
sight/site
seen/scene
waive/wave
sale/sail
mantle/mantel
troopers/troupers
grizzly/gristly, and grisly
stair/stare
meet/meat
whose/who’s
Misusing it’s for its drives me crazy, (and that’s a short drive). My teachers pounded this helpful hint into my head: “It’s” is a contraction of “it is.” Replace “its” with “it is” and if the sentence makes sense: “It is a gristly end . . .” you’re using it correctly.
Ditto for whose/who’s. Whose is a possessive adjective, as in “Whose book is that?” It also identifies someone or something: “I haven’t seen my ex-boyfriend, whose name I forget, in years.”
Who’s is a contraction of “who has” or “who is,” as in “Who’s a good boy?”
If you’re not sure, replace “who’s” with “who is” and see if it works.
As for the grisly business of grizzly, gristly, and grisly: Innocent grizzly bears and gristly, tough T-bones are being accused of grisly murders.
Misspellings include forsight, colonial for colonel, decreased and surprise. I worked for a newspaper that printed an expensive color Sunday magazine. The printed magazines were delivered early in the week.
On the color cover was a huge one-word headline: “Suprise!”
“Sheriff” confuses me so badly, I have to write down the correct version on a Post-it note to get it right.
“Sheriff” with one R and two Fs is the correct spelling for a law enforcement officer.
The double-barreled “Sherriff” (two Rs and two Fs) is an English author, screenwriter and playwright, R.C. Sherriff, best known for “Journey’s End,” based on his World War I experience.

Version 1.0.0
Last, but not least, are the perilous possessives for a name ending is S.
TKZer P J Parrish has warned us to avoid using names that end in S, but sometimes we can’t help it.
I had the evil Corliss boys. This line: The Corlis’s are the most callus outlaws . . .” should not have any apostrophe.
What if you want to say something belongs to the Corlisses? That’s depends on what style you or your publisher uses: Mine prefer Corliss’s. Others use Corliss’.
Both are correct.
Enjoy these tips to become better writers. Or is it righters?
My new Florida Beach mystery is due out in June. Preorder Sex and Death on the Beach here: bit.ly/3W6Y2Rp
I have the same problem with Marshal and Marshall as you do with Sheriff and Sherriff, dealing the Fire Marshal’s office as much as I do in my day job you’d think I’d remember… fortunately, his name’s not Marshall…
And while the homophone was the main topic, I am SURprised the Corliss Brothers weren’t “hung” for they’re fowl deeds… but I guess that would be too much to bare, huh?
The Corliss boys were quite a pear, George. I didn’t think I was a loud to do more damage to English.
Fun and informative, Elaine! I ran the story through ProWritingAid (desktop version for macOS) and caught 90% plus, but not all. As much as people rave about AI, it still can’t catch things that don’t trigger an error. For example, it did not flag homophonic. Great inspiration to double down on the edits and a warning to not rely 100% on our digital writing tools.
Thanks, Grant. Glad I beat AI, but I’m not ready to plays chess with a computer.
Fun quiz, Elaine. I caught most before I finished my first cup of coffee.
To add more confusion to sight/site, there’s also cite. Callous or callus?
The spelling of certain words continues to trip me up. Brocolli or broccoli? Relevent or relavent or relevant? I appreciate the squiggly red lines under misspellings but otherwise I ignore most suggestions from Word. It knows far less than my eighth grade English teacher, Mrs. Shore.
Definitely less knowledgeable than my eighth grade teacher as well…
Besides, I’ve so corrupted my spill-Chezk with compound contractions like “y’all’re” and “lemme” that I think it’s just given up… Artificial Intelligence eventually devolves into Actual Ignorance by its skimming everything from the interwebs without discernment…
My spelling seems to be deteriorating, Debbie. I blame all the bad examples I encounter.
I like that old cartoon where the kid looks at her broccoli and says, “I say it’s spinach and the hell with it!”
Just yesterday, I saw one of my pet peeves: peak instead of pique.
Fun list, and I’d have stopped reading after the first paragraph.
Arrrgh! Using pique incorrectly sends me into a fit of peak!
And then there’s peek…..
🙂
And don’t forget pique dresses and shirts.
Oh yeah!
Auto correct, predictive type, and phones are making things worse. Toss in that most news sources no longer have editors, and it is a wonder written English functions at all.
At least my newest phone has learned it is never duck. Now if I could teach it that 5 lbs. is in the middle of the sentence, not the end/beginning of two.
I feel you’re pain, Alan. Auto-correct never knows when to stop.
Fun topic, Elaine. My pet peeve is the same as Terry’s: the misuse of peak, peek, and pique. I was on the treadmill once watching a movie with subtitles. All three words were used in the movie, and the subtitles got them wrong every time. I had to stop the treadmill to have a laugh. I wonder if the subtitle creator did it on purpose.
Don’t get me started on subtitles, Kay. They’re the worst.
I’m chuckling and nodding my head, Elaine. I’ve been guilty of a few of these as well.
I swear Its/it’s was my nemesis at one time.
You needed the not-so-gentle reminders of Sister Mary Chandelier, Dale.
This was fun, Elaine!
My pettest peeve of them all is the use and misuse of apostrophe’s. 🙂 I see them everywhere. One misuse was even memorialized on a tombstone I saw recently.
Rant over. For now.
A misused apostrophe on a tombstone is taking English for granite, Deb.
🙂
I’m bothered by the same misspellings, Elaine.
This line cracked me up: As for the grisly business of grizzly, gristly, and grisly: Innocent grizzly bears and gristly, tough T-bones are being accused of grisly murders. LOL
And, of course, the second-to-last line of your instructions.
Instead, I put these errors into a short story. There are at last 30 mistakes in the story. See if you can spot them all.
I have read a few books that make me say, “didn’t anybody at all proof read this?” I have, as a friend, done some proofreading for authors. I am sure that I even missed some errors. That’s why having multiple people read the piece is important!
I quit after the first paragraph. It drives me crazy and has stopped me from reading what probably would have beenbeen good books.
P.S. I never pass on any memes that have grammatical or spelling errors.
I feel your pain, Jody. I can’t read poorly proofed books.