By PJ Parrish
A couple weeks ago, I posted about a writer who was having problems taming her backstory beast. Click here to review. She was really struggling because she was beginning to realize she actually had TWO main plots but one was disguising itself as backstory.
It got me thinking about simple story structure. Which is never really simple.
Simple explanation: Story structure (also known as narrative structure or plot structure) is a way of ordering all of the events in your book. Every story has a beginning, middle and end.
Not so simple part: There are myriad ways you can present your events in a story. And that’s what got my writer friend in trouble. She was having a really hard time figuring out how to structure her story. I suspect many of you out there have fought the same battle.
I often think of plot structure as architecture. There are countless ways to build a house. You can have a simple ranch. This is your basic whodunit, thriller or romance with a solid linear plot. You go in the door and progress easily through the rooms. It might be a small ranch house; it might be a grand one. But it is always built to lead you through with logic, harmony and balance. Call it fictional feng shui.
You can have a three-story filigreed French colonial. Twisting subplots, big cast of characters, high intrigue, multiple points of view, complex time-shifting narrative, unreliable narrators, multiple suspects. (James Ellroy’s LA Confidental comes to mind) See photo below!
Then there are the butt-ugly houses. Maybe they started out as a basic ranch but the writer lost control and start just tacking on action scenes, distracting subplots, and dumb secondary characters, hoping this would dazzle readers and hide the sad fact that the writer didn’t really know what the hell they are trying to say to begin with. (See this mess below)
Or sometimes, writers can’t figure out what KIND of book they’re writing. They deperately mix sub-genres (am I writing a a cozy or hardbioled? Should I give my hero a girlfriend? Maybe he needs a dog who helps him solve cases!) and they end up with something like this:
And then there are the tri-level builders. This is where I see writers mostly fail. You remember these houses from the 50s and 60s. You go in the door but you can’t decide whether to go up, down or sideways. Is that the basement or the rec room? And where the hell is the john? This, I think, is what happened to my writer. She had two main plots, a couple subplots and she just couldn’t figure out the best way to get in the door.
I love ranch houses. They are simple, linear, and you can’t fall down the stairs or get lost in them. For all you scholarly crime dogs out there, this basic ranch house plot structure has a fancy name — The Fichtean Curve. John Gardner usually gets credit for this in his 1983 book The Art of Fiction. But this sturdy structure has been basis for countless novels, especially commercial fiction.
Let’s break down the architecture. (I’m going to rely on Jaws as my example, because it’s a basic thriller plot that all of you know.)
Step 1: Rising Action
The story starts with some kind of inciting incident. What our own James calls a break in the norm. A murder, an abduction, a crisis of some kind that gets the narrative ball rolling. In Jaws, in the opening scene, a skinnydipping girl is devoured by a shark on Amity Island.
The main character has to WANT something. (to solve the case, save the child, catch the serial killer. And the WANT relates, in the best fiction, to some inner conflict for the hero. In Jaws, Chief Brody needs to figure out how to catch the serial killer shark.
The plot progresses through a series of crises wherein the protag faces set-backs that raise the stakes and things become more personal to the protag. In Jaws, Brody faces myriad obstacles, including the dumb mayor, free-lancing yahoos in skiffs, his own fear of water, and eventually the Ahab-ian shark-hunter Quint. Quint also represents one of the most effective tension-creating devices in rising action — a riff in the team.
Step 2: the Climax
Rinsing action is the bulk of your structure, but the climax is the apex. It could be a final battle or confrontation, a big reveal or giant plot twist. In Jaws, of course, the climax builds as the Orca slowly gets destroyed, Quint gets eaten, Hooper is lost, and Brody becomes isolated on the sinking mast, praying his last bullet will hit its target. Which it does in spectacular fashion.
Step 3: Falling Action
Also called the denouement. The bad guy is vanquished. The child is saved. The case is solved. We get to take a well-earned breath. Any plot loose ends are wrapped up. (Although not all stories have an extended falling action. Jaws’s denouement is brief.) But beyond tying things up, the purpose of falling action is also to give you the writer an opportunity to emphasize the theme of your story, and stress how the hero has been impacted. It’s not how the detective works the case. It’s how the case works on the detective.
One last point, because I’ve gone long here today. There are many other ways to structure your story. And depending on how firm your grasp is on your craft, you might be comfortable with more complex architecture. We can talk about that another day. But when it doubt, bet it all on the ranch.
“Fictional Feng Shui” – what a marvelous description of a well written story.
One of these days, I might actually have to watch Jaws.
My Mapleton mysteries are police procedurals. Sort of. There’s a ‘cozy’ feel to them per some of my readers, and I try to balance how much ‘on the job’ stuff and how much ‘off the job’ stuff shows up on the page.
Jaws will be on the big screen in selected cities soon. But it is all over the subscription services all the time. You should watch it. It does follow the classic horror movie Fichtean Curve (I learned something today 🙂 ) The shark doesn’t make an appetence until half way through the movie.
I know! I have used Jaws as a workshop template for years. Have two Powerpoints devoted to it. It works because everyone (except Terry!) has seen the movie (which is better than the book imho). And as you said, it hews to the classic structure that’s so easy to grasp. And yeah, Spielberg was really Hitchkockian-smart to keep his serial killer hidden as long as he could. The anticiipation is delicious.
And I’ve been privy to a number of your workshops, Kris, with your Jaws template. 🙂
Well, writers of experience can mix genres. The results are often original and fresh. Ditto with all the other complexities we come up with. I guess I’m just asking beginnings to KISS.
Great post. I especially appreciate all the house picture! LOL
Recently went through this with my last book until I had to stop and say wait a minute. How do these two stories interrelate? Once I found the common thread, everything came together in that one story layout 😊
I am a Home and Garden Network junkie. I love anything to do with home decor and esp the re-dos. Had a ball finding the photos. Plus I have psychological scars from the horrible tri-level house where I babysat two brats when I was a teenager.
Love this “framing” of story structure, Kris. I agree about the beauty of simplicity, especially as someone who, when writing mysteries, tends to combine cozy with traditional, and has to simplify the design from a big tri-level to more of a ranch.
My first attempt at a mystery is best described as a pup tend. Nothing happened in it.
I love analogies, Kris. Showing story as architecture is so helpful. A couple of those photos do a good job of show vs. tell.
I am seeing the importance of the editor here. When Sir John Secondary Character, the subplot is more in the way and needs to be shelved maybe to star in his own story.
Ha! Or he’s the guy who sings too loudly in the choir.
I’m just starting a book, so this is really helpful as I wander around wondering how I did it before. This.happens.every.time.
It happens to all of us, I think, even those who’ve successfully published. My last stand alone “She’s Not There” (this was about book 13) began as a ranch-house strictly linear plot. But a secondary character (who was actually hired to chase down the main character) became so compelling that I had to rebuild the plot and give him equal POV. It happened about a third in and I knew I had to go back and redo things.