First Page Critique: Beethoven
And the Well-Aimed Bullet

To play a wrong note is insignificant. To play without passion is inexcusable —  Ludwig van Beethoven

By PJ Parrish

A new First Pager found its way to my in-box Sunday, and it had such an immediate impact on me that I decided to postpone my post-in-progress and use the submission. I think it offers us a good departure point for a discussion about using pacing to keep the reader in the reality of the moment.  The fact that I was listening to Beethoven’s Ninth as I wrote this well, I’ll get to that in a sec.

First, a huge thank-you to the writer for letting us learn from your first page. (And I wish you had sent us a bit more. Your line spacing bar must be set at 3!) Before I talk, take a moment to read today’s submission:

A Thriller – KEEP IT SAFE

I levered the cork out of a bottle of Chardonnay and a bullet slammed into my back. Below the right shoulder blade. More to the center. A lousy spot where if you have a rash or insect bite it’s impossible to scratch and not look like you’re having a seizure of some sort. If I knew this was the night someone was out to kill me I would have brought something up from the cellar more unique than a domestic Chardonnay, even though it had a pleasant balance of oak to it. There was that bottle or Nieto Senetiner Malbec from Argentina, I was holding for a special occasion, for example.

Anyway, the chard went flying, the bottle hit my hardwood floor, didn’t break, the amber liquid flowed out. As for me, the impact of the slug jolted me forward. I tripped over my feet and did a full body slam on the deck.

There I was, face down, flat on a hard wood floor, my back hurt like hell and I heard heavy footsteps crunch their way over to me. We’re talking serious, heavy duty, outdoorsman rubber soles here.

________________________________

Short and sweet, right? Well, it’s not bad. I like that we are immediately in a dramatic moment, but I think the writer has two problems here, and by addressing them this opening might go from adequate (I’ve read this setup before) to unique (Yes, I have read this before but this reads so well that I’ll stick around a little longer).

What are the problems? I think the issues are with point of view and pacing — or more to the point, that sweet spot where the two intersect.

This opening is pure action scene, right? But the only action is the uncorking of a bottle and then a bullet in the back. We get no setting and no sense of who this man is, although because this is first person, I am guessing he’s the protagonist. (If not, that’s another issue for another post). Now, I don’t mind this lack of information — it’s sort of intriguing — but with such an abbreviated submission, I can’t tell if the writer will soon give us the context we need to care about this poor guy.

Pacing is important in your whole story, but when you are in an action scene like this, it is extra-critical.  When you move into an action scene, you the writer need to shift gears, changing your style (word choice, syntax, size of sentences and paragraphs) so the reader gets a sense of speed, urgency (which is different than speed) and intensity. Action scenes are meant as a contrast to slower scenes of information. They are meant to be ingested quickly in smaller and sharper bites rather than digested in more leisurely paced scenes. Think staccato not legato.

But, but…my overall writing style is more legato! Yeah, I hear you. I know. I’m a legato by nature, too, but I’m learning (still!) when I need to switch to staccato.

Okay, think Beethoven. I’m going to him because as I said, he was my soundtrack today as I wrote. Beethoven was a genius, an original. But like any good genre writer, he worked within a “formula” — the classic symphony. The classic symphony has four movements: The opening (allegro or “lively”), the second (adagio or “slow”), the third (scherzo or “quick) and fourth (allegro presto or molto or “really fast!”)

This roughly translates to crime fiction’s three-act structure: a quick intriguing opening that hints at the story and theme to come; the middle where motivations, backstory, clue-trail and complications are laid out; and the climax where the action peaks, the hero usually triumphs, themes are echoed, and all is resolved.

Now by the time Beethoven got to his magnum opus ninth, he knew all the ropes and tropes so he played with the structure a little, moving the scherzo ahead of the adagio, but we’ll ignore that for now.

Let’s start with Beethoven’s “First Page.” He specified the tempo of the ninth’s opening as allegro ma non troppo, which means “quickly but not too fast.” Which is what you want in a book thriller or mystery — a quick-paced intriguing setup but with something held in reserve for the climax. Bear with me, but please go listen to a few moments of how the ninth begins:

Hear that cool quiet introduction? It’s almost creepy with its build-up of tension. But then, thirty seconds in — BAM! — Beethoven hits us with a bullet in the back. This is what I wish our writer had given us.  Before the man gets shot, give us maybe a graph or two that serves as a quick line-sketch of where we are and who we are watching. Maybe a bit of mood. I can’t tell if this man is a seasoned operative or cop who senses that someone is coming to kill him tonight or if he’s a civilian oenophile who’s just unlucky. A few well-placed bars could have gone a long way here, and then when we do get the bullet in the back, it would sting even more.

Let’s move on to Beethoven’s adagio. Again, listen to just a few bars and come back.

Here, Beethoven is laying out the theme. Here, we crime writers would use this middle to give us the context for what we witnessed in the opening, tell readers about our characters and their motivations, slip in backstories, begin addressing theme, and set up complications. But even when the tempo is slower, you still need to watch pace. The ninth’s 14-minute third movement is all in slow tempo, yet if you listen to the 9:30 moment, you hear a definite building of tension, a dark foreshadowing, and a hint of the ninth’s booming climax.

Then we get to the fourth movement of the ninth, and boy, what a doozy of a climax. Beethoven opens with a rush of urgent sound — the car chase has begun, the hero is in pursue down the unlit hall — but then he backs away and the mood goes dark and swirly. If you know the ninth, you know how the story ends — as it should in redemptive triumph. But check out the opening moments for now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXOG4X-6bz8

Now back to our submission and that sweet spot where pace and point of view intersect.

The main issue I have with the submission is that it is neither staccato or legato but a curious hybrid of the two that fails to deliver on the premise promised by the setup. It’s like the writer was listening to the adagio instead of the allegro as he wrote it. The plot event (getting shot) is intrinsically fast yet the style of this opening is leisurely, almost as if the character is sitting in a bar ten years later telling a friend what happened to him. Let’s go to Track Changes. The comments in red are mine:

I levered I rather like this verb choice here though it’s technically incorrect the cork out of a bottle of Chardonnay and a bullet slammed into my back. Below the right shoulder blade. More to the center. A lousy spot where if you have a rash or insect bite it’s impossible to scratch and not look like you’re having a seizure of some sort. These thoughts are out of place. there is no time for such navel-gazing when you are in mortal danger. If I knew this was the night someone was out to kill me A character can’t know what he can’t know ie: Little did he know…. I would have brought something up from the cellar more unique than a domestic Chardonnay, even though it had a pleasant balance of oak to it. Again, he’s about to die so he’s not  thinking about bouquets. There was that bottle or Nieto Senetiner Malbec from Argentina, I was holding for a special occasion, for example.

When I first read this, I wondering if the writer was going for satire here, maybe doing an homage to old detective movies.

Anyway, anytime you have to resort to his word, your transition is weak. the chard went flying, the bottle hit my hardwood floor, didn’t break, the amber liquid flowed out. Again, if you’re shot, you aren’t likely to be thinking in terms of “chard” and “amber liquid.” As for me, another weird transition that jerks me out of the moment the impact of the slug jolted me forward. I tripped over my feet and did a full body slam on the deck. He just falls to the floor. Also, he‘s outdoors? I thought he was on a hardwood floor.

There I was, another of those weird transitions. face down, flat on a hard wood floor, my back hurt like hell and I heard heavy footsteps crunch rubber crunches on wood? their way over to me. We’re talking serious, heavy duty, outdoorsman rubber soles here.

So see the problem here? This is an adagio tempo imposed on what should be an allegro moment.  It’s hard enough to mix tempos between scenes and keep the pacing good. But when you mix the two within a scene, we hear only noise, not the special music of your style.

My sister Kelly is good at writing action scenes, better than I am. So I asked her to give this a quick rewrite while still honoring the writer’s setup and style. I offer this not because I believe one writer’s style should be imposed on another — you need to find your own voice! — but to show how to keep a character’s point of view firmly in the reality of the moment.

Just as I levered the cork from the Chardonnay, I heard a sharp crack and felt something hit my back — a hard, hot poke that I instantly knew was a bullet.

I dropped the bottle, heard it clunk but not break, as it hit the kitchen floor. I grabbed for the counter, trying to stay upright, trying hard to breathe, but my legs caved and I hit the floor.

The pooled wine felt cool against my face and though I knew I had taken a bullet, knew someone outside my window had just tried to kill me, I had the strangest thought — I should have brought up the bottle of Nieto Senetiner Malbec, because that would be a much more dignified wine to die in.

The difference here is that Kelly has included only those things that would register in the man’s consciousness given the dire circumstances. She saved that odd thought about the Malbec for a kicker…and it comes only AFTER the man is down and bleeding. If you are lying on the floor with a bullet in your back, well, yeah, you might have a weird existential thought — I should’ve, I could’ve, I didn’t, I never… But save it for when there is a “quiet” moment in your action scene, make it quick, and then get back to the action at hand.

I’ll leave you with a few, ahem, bullet points about pacing and point of view.

  • Never include unnecessary details that can disrupt the flow of the action. If you have a helicopter crash into a mountain, don’t stop and have the pilot tell me that in his long history of flying with the army, including that tour in Nam, this helicopter model always had a history of tail-rotor failure.  If a wounded man finds himself face down in a pool of wine, don’t stop and give me a detailed memory of that year he spent in his twenties backpacking through France.
  • Describe the scene only through what your character can know. If he is lying on the floor dying, he can only see what is in front of him — the steel tip of an approaching boot comes slowly into focus. And use all the senses! Beginning writers are overly reliant on sight. In action scenes, other senses are often more powerful. A blindfolded man hears a sloshing sound then smells gasoline.  A woman victim feels the featherly caress of a cold gun against her cheek.
  • Make your physical movements clear and concise.  Moving characters around in space is grunt work but you have to pay attention. He walked into the bedroom, she turned the corner…etc.  But in action scenes, you have to be careful that you choreograph each step on the page so the reader has no doubt what is happening to whom.
  • But don’t over-describe. In your head, your action scene is playing out like the slow-mo shoot-out in Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch. On your first draft, sure, go ahead and bleed purple. But then go back and clean things up. Remember — as in sex scenes, which are also action scenes, less is usually more.

Thanks again, dear writer. I would like to read more. The set-up is intriguing. And a character who would rather have a majestic Malbec from Argentina instead of a plunky Chardonnay from Trader Joe’s is worth following.

This entry was posted in Writing by PJ Parrish. Bookmark the permalink.

About PJ Parrish

PJ Parrish is the New York Times and USAToday bestseller author of the Louis Kincaid thrillers. Her books have won the Shamus, Anthony, International Thriller Award and been nominated for the Edgar. Visit her at PJParrish.com

16 thoughts on “First Page Critique: Beethoven
And the Well-Aimed Bullet

  1. A very interesting read and some great points I will be trying to adopt in my writing in the future.

    “the impact of the slug jolted me forward. I tripped over my feet and did a full body slam on the deck – He just falls to the floor. Also, he‘s outdoors? I thought he was on a hardwood floor.”

    Is the writer English, by chance? We tend to use the word “deck” for floor. I agree it could be misleading as deck is used differently in the US, and lets not forget he could have been shot on a boat…

    • Ah…good point Dave. I often forget the myriad but important nuances in English here and there. This goes to my point that just a few more well chosen details of setting and mood would have grounded us enough so these nits weren’t there to pick. I don’t think a lot of description here is merited — it goes against the writer’s style — but a little would have gone a long way.

  2. I much preferred the re-write… except for the paragraph ending in a preposition (“in”), which misses out on using a point of stress effectively; however, I realize that when we re-write something intending it to be teaching examples, we aren’t editing final copy.

    I thought the analysis was excellent, PJ.

    One thing I’ve noticed when editing manuscripts is that writers who can do humor (I cannot; not in a million years) often throw it in at the wrong moment. Perhaps this is one of the reasons this writer may have a tendency to forget about pacing… they may be relying too much on humor to show their voice. Humor can become a writing tic for those writers. I can’t tell you how many ‘tics’ I’ve learned to control, and I’m sure many more await me.

    BTW, although I’ve used it, I still dislike using ‘their’ and ‘they’ instead of s/he, or rewording entirely.

    • Argh! Don’t get me going on “their” as a sub for singular he and she. I know it is becoming accepted but I still don’t like it either!

      And yeah, you’re right about the dangling prep. I’d get it in rewrites. :))

      You make a point about tone. We’re not sure what it is. But that is partly because the writer sent in so little material, I think.

  3. What a terrific review! I like the analogy to classical music and would love to know your playlist. Do you coordinate your music to the book Act on which you are working?
    I hope my first page floats to the top of the heap sometime, I would love (and fear) such an evaluation.

  4. I don’t usually listen to music when working on my book Tammy…I find it too distracting because I drift out of my fictional world and into that of the composer. I write best to only silence or the white noise of a cafe or bar. Although for some reason having sports talk radio on works, too, for clearing the brain.

    I do tend to listen to music while I write TKZ posts. Don’t know why! It helps me think clearly. Usually classical or good old stuff like Tony Bennett, Sinatra and Ella Fitzgerald.

  5. This opening hooked me at first and the suggested rewrite–100% allegro–hooked me harder. I like it. I like the character.

    One tiny issue, PJ. You did not give author’s name. Based on the Chardonnay, I assumed protagonist was female. Malbec sounds way more masculine. Would a guy want to die face down in Chardonnay? Or is that part of the joke?!?

  6. We never know our submitters name or gender so I was guessing I was dealing with male on both writer and character. But I have been wrong before!

  7. Wow! One of the best First Page reviews I’ve read on TKZ! Bravo!

  8. Thanks for another great Tuesday read! The music metaphor is a cool way to think about pacing. Nice rewrite by Kelly — I find those snippets very enlightening.

  9. I really liked this piece a lot. And with great respect, PJ, I disagree with many of your points. One of the weaknesses of any First Page Critique exercise is that so few words give too little time for the theme to develop, to borrow from the musical analogy. The transition from the scherzo to the finale in Beethoven’s 5th Symphony would register as weird and inadequate if it were left just floating in its own space. In the greater context, though, it’s one of the best moments and transitions in all of classical music. (Okay, opinions may vary on that–but that’s kind of my point.)

    I think the author of this piece was going for an atmospheric feel–sort of an old timey noir feel–and I think he was largely successful. Look, we know he survived the attack, right? We know this because he’s writing in the past tense. On that context, I think the narrative style gives us a peek into the character.

    My thoughts:

    I levered [***the correct verb if using a sommelier’s cork screw] the cork out of a bottle of Chardonnay and a bullet slammed into my back. Below the right shoulder blade. More to the center. A lousy spot where if you have a rash or insect bite it’s impossible to scratch and not look like you’re having a seizure of some sort. [***This is a defining moment in the narrative, I think. A brilliant detail that specifically locates the point of the anatomy.] If I knew this was the night someone was out to kill me I would have brought something up from the cellar more unique than a domestic Chardonnay, even though it had a pleasant balance of oak to it. There was that bottle or Nieto Senetiner Malbec from Argentina, I was holding for a special occasion, for example. [***Again, this works for me. In fact, on balance, I’m not sure this is even designed to be an action scene. I see it as a scene to establish backstory while revealing character.]

    Anyway,[***I agree that the “anyway” doesn’t work] the chard went flying, the bottle hit my hardwood floor, didn’t break, the amber liquid flowed out. As for me, the impact of the slug jolted me forward. I tripped over my feet and did a full body slam on the deck. [***Deck means indoor floor in many parts of the world, as well as among employment specialties. The Navy, for example. But Author, the fact of the confusion should serve as an alert.]

    There I was, face down, flat on a hard wood floor, my back hurt like hell and I heard heavy footsteps crunch their way over to me. We’re talking serious, heavy duty, outdoorsman rubber soles here. [***Again, I find this a very engaging voice.]

    For me, this piece passes the main test with flying colors, and that test is, would I continue reading? Absolutely.

    • This is what I love about our critiques: John’s points here remind us there is no one path to a truth and that every writer has to find his own way. I agree is is near impossible to judge the tone and intent of this piece on such a small sample. I, too, would have read on because I do like the voice here (as I said, I also felt it had an old-timey noir feel). There’s a talent here, for sure. So here’s a good lesson: that taste is in the ear of the beholder and that this more measured opening might need time to…well, breathe after it is opened. As I said, I wish the writer had submitted more. Maybe we could tell more clearly if, as John suggests, this is more of a memory than an actual on-camera event.

      p.s. The ninth’s scherzo is one of my fave things in all of music. I’d have it played at my funeral. 🙂

      • I have been devouring the YouTube videos of Christian Thielemann and Vienna Philharmonic’s interpretations of the Beethoven symphonies. Thielemann learned at the feet of Herbert von Karajan, and I think he’s terrific.

  10. Sorry that I’ve come a little late to the party here, but I do have a suggestion. Even though this sample is small, it is full of what I call “overwriting.” Some examples:

    “A lousy spot where if you have a rash or insect bite it’s impossible to scratch and not look like you’re having a seizure of some sort.”

    Get rid of the “of some sort.” Phrases like this always detract from writing.

    “If I knew this was the night someone was out to kill me I would have brought something up from the cellar more unique than a domestic Chardonnay, even though it had a pleasant balance of oak to it.”

    More overwriting, mixed tenses. Try something like:

    If I’d known someone was out to kill me tonight, I wouldn’t be drinking domestic Chardonnay, not even one with a pleasant oak balance..

    “There was that bottle or Nieto Senetiner Malbec from Argentina, I was holding for a special occasion, for example.”

    More overwriting. Get rid of the “for example” and tighten this. Try something like:

    I’d have gone for that bottle of Nieto Senetiner Malbec from Argentina.

    Sometimes less is more. Trimming sentences can make them more powerful.

    “Anyway, the chard went flying, the bottle hit my hardwood floor, didn’t break, the amber liquid flowed out. As for me, the impact of the slug jolted me forward. I tripped over my feet and did a full body slam on the deck.”

    More overwriting. The sentence starters “anyway” and “as for me” don’t add anything here. In fact, they detract.

    “There I was, face down, flat on a hard wood floor, my back hurt like hell and I heard heavy footsteps crunch their way over to me. We’re talking serious, heavy duty, outdoorsman rubber soles here.”

    Long rambling sentences slow the pacing. I don’t like reusing the word “heavy” here. Try something like:

    I was face down on a hardwood floor. My back hurt like hell. Heavy footsteps crunched toward me. I could smell the rubber on the soles of the hiking shoes.

    You get the idea. Best of luck, and keep writing.

  11. It reads like the author is attempting the unruffled, nonchalant voice of some English adventure story characters – where danger is met with a sardonic smile and a witty retort.

    That sort of character would be more worried about the quality of the wine than their gunshot wound. Escapist fun, not realism.

    Think of Roger Moore’s James Bond as an example – always cool, witty, well dressed, aristocratic, etc. Or the the Charlie Mortdecai books – haven’t seen the film – which have an unusual blend of crime and insouciance.

    I like what it is trying to do – and yes, I would keep reading – but the first page doesn’t quite work for me. I want to know a little more about the character before they are shot. Just something to show that they are the unflappable type, so that it makes sense for them to think about the contents of the wine cellar when there’s a bullet in their back.

Comments are closed.