Plotting Words of Wisdom

Learning how to effectively plot stories and novels was one of the keys to eventual publication for me. Reading Plot and Structure by our very own James Scott Bell got me started on the path to being able to write fiction that succeeded in engaging and immersing readers in a compelling storyline.

Today’s Words of Wisdom shares three excerpts of TKZ posts from 2011-2013, each providing useful advice on the fine art of plotting your fiction. Interestingly, each one was originally published in May—perhaps there’s a special plotting vibe to that month. More likely it’s just coincidence, but we fictioneers live to find meaning, so, after finding these three wonderful post I like to think of May as being unofficial plotting fiction month.

First, Joe Moore presents screenplay 9-Act Structure. Then, Claire Langley-Hawthorne looks at a powerful tip from JSB’s Plot and Structure on his LOCK and strengthening a potentially sagging middle of a novel . Finally,  P.J. Parrish shows how to plot visually.

When I looked into plot structure for fiction—while I was still delusional about having the capability to actually plot—I found references to the Nine-Act Screenplay Structure. This is the basic framework of today’s blockbuster movies. You’ll see 3-Acts and 12-Acts, but I played with this version below as a format and had some success in conceptually plotting one or two of my earlier stories. Ah, the ambiguity…

It’s my belief that once your brain grasps the concept of this structure, you may automatically follow the idea whether you’re aware of it or not. As a visual learner, it helped me to draft this and embed it in my brain, like a time bomb triggered to go off when I sat in front of my computer.

The 9-Act structure is similar to the classic Hero’s Journey that you may have seen, but I thought this would be interesting to talk about. See what you think. Would something like this work for writing a novel?

Word of Caution – Once you see this framework, you may not enjoy movies the same way again. Just sayin’…

Nine-Act Screenplay Structure

Act 0—During Opening Credits First 5 Minutes (film time)
What strikes the conflict—sets it up—event years earlier may plant the seed of conflict

Act 1—Opening Image—The Panoramic Crane Shot Next 5 Minutes

Act 2—Something Bad Happens 5 Minutes
In a crime story, it’s usually the murder—Reveal the bad front man, but hold off on the introduction of the bad head honcho until later

Act 3—Meet Hero/Protagonist 15 minutes
Meet hero—give him 3 plot nudges to push him to commit

Act 4—Commitment 5-10 Minutes
The push—Usually one scene that’s a door to Act 5—1-way door, no turning back

Act 5—Go for wrong goal – approx. 30 minutes est.
A series of 8-12 min. cycles called whammos or complications followed by a rest period of 5 minutes or so to uncover some of the backstory. End this act with the lowest point for the protagonist. The dark moment.

Act 6—Reversal 5-10 Minutes—Usually 70 Minutes into the Film
The last clue discovered—Now Act 2 makes sense—It is the low point, a history lesson usually revealed by the bad guy/honcho—but reveals the Achilles heel of the nemesis too.

Act 7—Go for New Goal 15-20 Minutes
The clock is ticking—Hero has a new plan. The action seesaws back and forth with nemesis and hero gaining & losing ground between each other—usually takes place in 24 hours within the context of the movie. Favors are repaid, magic, good luck happens. The new plan is kept secret. New goal is achieved.

Act 8—Wrap it Up 5 minutes
Back to where it all began—a feeling of accomplishment & rebirth—the world restored. Ahh!

Now having outlined this plotting structure, I’m not sure if following something like this (without deviation) would hamper creativity by providing too much framework. This would be like “the rules” of writing. Maybe rules are there to be understood, but we shouldn’t be afraid to break them either.

I tend to “think” about my book ahead of time and let my brain ponder what I call my “big ticket” plot movements—like what my black moment will be for my main character(s). I also develop my ideas on who the main cast of characters will be and maybe where I might set the story location(s).

Joe Moore—May 19, 2011

For me, the hardest part of plotting is keeping things simple (as I have a tendency to overly complicate everything!) and because of this I outline (and re-outline) throughout the writing and editing process. Even if you don’t outline, however, I think you need to have a mental grip on the key elements of plot as you are writing.

Now, I get to make an unsolicited plug for James Scott Bell’s excellent book Plot & Structure: Techniques and exercises for crafting a plot that grips readers from start to finish. In this, Jim summarizes the basic plot elements with the acronym LOCK:

  • Lead (the main character that draws readers into the story)
  • Objective (what gives the lead a reason for being in the story – what compels and drives them -often either to get something or to get away from something)
  • Confrontation (the battle between the lead and the opposition – what is preventing the lead from achieving what he/she needs)
  • Knockout (an ending that answers all the major questions and which leaves the reader satisfied)

In so doing Jim neatly encapsulates the critical elements needed for a successful book – particularly a thriller or mystery. As Jim points out, confrontation is the engine of plot and at critical junctures in the book the lead must face his/her battles  in order to transition to the next level of confrontation in the story.

When facing a sagging middle, I always remember Jim’s comment that middles are all about confrontations and setting up for the final battle to come. This helps me keep focus and tension in those murky middle waters. I also find that right from the start I have the key plot elements in mind and these continually inform the writing process and keep me on track.

Claire Langley-Hawthorne—May 28, 2012

 

We talk a lot here at The Kill Zone about the difference between plotters vs pantsers. (i.e. do you outline or do you wing it?). But we never talk about the picture makers. I am a picture maker. I can’t keep control of my story, can’t control its pacing and rhythms, can’t really SEE where it’s going, unless I draw it.

I used to think I was alone in this but I found out many authors use some kind of story boarding. Some even use software for it, Scrivner being a favorite. My dear late friend Barbara Parker had beautifully rendered storyboards on her office wall that would have made any Hollywood mogul proud.  My scribbles aren’t nearly so neat but they do the job. It also something born of necessity because if you work with a collaborator, you both have to be literally on the same page.

My co-author sister Kelly and I happened upon our methodology by accident about nine books ago. She was visiting me here in Florida and one day I came home and saw this:

Kelly had written all our plot points down on scraps of paper and taped them to a board. (The wine is an optional but vital writing tool). We found this was a quick way to visualize our plot, move chapters or add things. It also acts as a chronology and time line, which is valuable during rewrites. We eventually graduated to Post-It notes. And the PLOT BOARD, as we call it, became more complicated as we refined our methods:

One Post-It per chapter, each with the salient plot points in that chapter. Usually, our Louis Kincaid books are written only from his POV so it’s all yellow. EXCEPT: we sometimes use pink for what we call “personal” chapters. This is because as we mix “case/plot” chapters with character-development chapters (ie personal) we are constantly aware of the need to keep the main plot moving. Too many pinks in a row? That’s death in a suspense novel so we find a way to distribute that extra pink stuff around. It’s all about pacing. This board above, however, is for HEART OF ICE, which is a more complex plot. It has five POVS, so we use a different color for each. Again, it helps with pacing.

But we do more than just plotting on boards. We often need some pretty elaborate drawings, maps, and charts to keep track of things.

This board above was for THE LITTLE DEATH. The plot concerns multiple bodies found in disparate locations in Florida’s cattle country. Louis finds no connections between the murders until he digs deep into each victim’s life. This board helped up keep the victims’s backgrounds straight as well as where the bodies were found in relation to each other (an important clue).

Here is a board for A THOUSAND BONES. This book drove us nuts because the plot, about a serial killer operating over almost 20 years, was very complex. Its backstory begins in 1964 and the main plot moves to 1990. The killer left tree carvings with each victim but the carvings changed as he got older. We had to kept track of each girl’s backstory, where the body was found (the color coding), what personal items were found with each, and what carving.

PJ Parrish—May 28, 2013

***

  1. What do you think of the nine-act structure? Do you have a plot structure, be it 3-act, 4-act, 7-point, W plot, or something else which you find especially helpful?
  2. Have you used the LOCK approach? Any advice on propping up a sagging middle of a novel?
  3. Have you plotted visually? If so, what’s your approach?
  4. If you’re a pantser, do you use any of these plotting approaches or others to help with your revisions?

20 thoughts on “Plotting Words of Wisdom

  1. It’s funny, I’ve carefully plotted and then gone off course. I’ve visually plotted then never looked at it. And I’ve pantsed with terrible results. I’m starting to think I need to plot just to tell myself the story, and then I need to put the outline away and write it, sorta aiming for each next major plot point.

    But I do think the hook, inciting incident, point of no return, mirror moment, dark night of the soul, and climax are all important.

    • FWIW, Priscilla, I think plotting “just” to tell yourself the story, and then putting the outline away to write, “aiming for each next major plot point” is a very valid approach, which lets you collaborate effectively with your unconscious. I’ve been guilty of spending far too much in outline mode, trying to come up with a bullet-proof story that I can just type out, when my process is very much a collaboration between my conscious and unconscious, both in first draft and in the initial revision.

      Hope you have a wonderful day!

  2. Great collection, Dale. Thanks!

    One visual that really helped me understand plot structure was the circus tent. I went googling for it and who pops up but TKZ emeritus Larry Brooks, quoted on this blog: https://terrijhuck.com/2013/07/01/circus-tents-and-story-structure/

    B/c I’m basically a pantser, I sometimes get stuck in dead ends. At that point, I use old-fashioned index cards, one card per scene, similar to Kris’s post-its. Being able to visually rearrange scenes and POVs helps, esp. with complex timelines.

    • The circus tent is an insightful way of showing plot structure, Debbie. Thanks for sharing it. I was fortunate to take a workshop at Willamette Writers conference way back in 2009 which built on some of the principles I’d learned from JSB’s “Plot and Structure.”

      Your index card approach to help yourself out of narrative dead-ends is a great approach. I’ve done a bit of that myself.

      Have a great Saturday!

    • I’ve tried both working as a plotter and a pantser and in both cases I work myself into dead ends and have to work my way out again. So I’m still trying to figure out if I’m going to be a plotter or pantser when I grow up. LOLOL!!!!!!

    • You’re very welcome, Jim. I can’t thank you enough for not just “Plot and Structure,” but “Write Your Novel From the Middle” and “Super Structure” in helping me with own plotting.

      Looking forward to your post tomorrow!

  3. I’ve always been a pantser or organic writer. When I see 3-act, 9-act, etc., my eyes glaze over. It takes the fun out of writing for me and turns it into homework. I keep a copy of Steven James’ Story Trumps Structure on my shelf. In the intro he writes, “”If you’re courageous enough to ditch the formulas and templates and instead step into the heart of narrative, you can become a better storyteller. And if you’re open to letting the stories you tell trump the structure you’ve been taught, it will transform the way you craft your stories forever.” This appeals to my rule-breaking, rebellious heart, but I also believe writers should do whatever works for them and not judge those who do it differently. We’re all working toward the same goal–telling great stories.

    • Thanks for weighing, Kelly. I started out as a pure pantser, discovering drafting my first four novels that way. For me, moving over to the outline side of the writing force gave me the key to writing stories that worked, but as you said, each of us should do what works for us.

      Excellent point that all of us aim for the same objective–“telling great stories.” How we get that is individual to each of us.

    • Kelly,
      I’ve been working my way through your Amish novels, and I’ve loved every one. For years, I’ve been reading with the goal of breaking down books I love (mostly romance or romantic suspense), trying to pinpoint all the “required “ plot points. I keep thinking I’m blind, because if they’re there, I’m not seeing them. What you’ve written here has been a big relief.

      The first book I wrote was published by what was at that time Berkeley Penguin Putnam, now Berkeley Random House. I didn’t even know about structure. I just wrote the story that came to me as I typed. I have read some books that are so obviously written to structure that I find myself waiting for each and finding them exactly where they’re “supposed” to be. I seldom read another book by those authors. I’m getting Story Trumps Structure in the hopes that it will free me to write the story and not worry about all the plot points. In looking back at my first, I see it naturally has some of the most important ones in more or less the right places. Instinctive storytelling from a lifetime of reading and hearing stories.
      Thank you.

  4. Great review here, Dale! I keep thinking I’d like to try the post-it note method. This post is another burr under my saddle to get me going.

    And this I love, it just resonates: …but we fictioneers live to find meaning…

    Have a great weekend!

  5. I’m an extreme plotter, and the only novelist I know who plots with Dramatica (a screenwriter tool).

    It’s a very logical system that includes characters and character relationships and roles in the plotting from the very beginning, and something about the mathematical nature of it appealed to me.

    It has a steep learning curve, and somewhat arcane terminology, but it suits me – and I plotted both the trilogy and the individual novels in my slightly tweaked version.

    I wouldn’t suggest it for anyone, especially beginners, but it suits me, and has helped create very interconnected writing of which one of my favorite reviewers said, “The plot is more than character-driven; there is a sense in which the plot is the characters.”

    For me, this has meant getting to each planned scene with the pieces that made sense already there and waiting to be written. And connecting a very large number of characters and threads in the plot throughout the three books.

    This was critical for me. Because of a limited brain damaged by ME/CFS, I can focus on writing only one chunk – about a scene – at a time. I can’t do ‘drafts.’ But I trust – and rarely have to change – that the scene will connect right to all the others. With over 64 named characters, it gets tricky without a system. I almost never have to go back to a previous scene to change anything.

    The writing is of course a separate beast, but it seems to benefit from the structure, too.

    I’m still waiting for the 64-bit version for Mac, but fortunately had plotting for the trilogy done before the computer architecture changed.

    • It sounds like you have a great system worked out, Alicia, to help you write despite all your challenges. I did look at Dramatica like fifteen years ago and, no, it won’t work for me 🙂 But it works for you, and that’s what matters.

      • No pantser should ever go near it.

        But I don’t find it constraining – I find it more like the best list of prompts to answer to dig the story out before I write. With my brain, it’s good to know I’ve answered all the relevant questions.

        If you’re a plotter.

  6. Great collection of wisdom, Dale. JSB’s Plot and Structure was one of the first two craft books I read when I started on my first novel. It’s absolutely foundational for me.

    I use post-it notes to plot. (I have a three-door closet in my office which works well for the three-act structure.) I wrote a TKZ post about it a while back:
    https://killzoneblog.com/2023/02/plotting-with-post-it-notes.html

    It’s an iterative process for me, but I’m drawn to the tactile nature of working with post-it notes, and I like to begin a writing session by standing in front of the “plot doors” to review the story and decide if anything needs to be changed.

    • We did something similar at the two-week novel writing workshop I attended at the University of Kansas in 2013, plotting with post-its on huge sheets of butcher paper. Closet doors are perfect for that 🙂

Comments are closed.